Antedon serrata — The Life Data

Animalia/Echinodermata/Crinoidea/Comatulida/Antedonidae/Antedon

At a glance

Occurrence records133

Data sources7

Biological traits4

DNA specimens4

eDNA detections1

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Antedon serrata's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility64 records↗

OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System69 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics4 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources4 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF · OBIS133 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD4 specimens

01Narrative

Antedon serrata is een haarster uit de familie Antedonidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort werd in 1908 gepubliceerd door Austin Hobart Clark.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesSeaLifeBase

Habitat & environment2

Habitat saltwateryes

Habitat zonebenthic

Other traits2

Depth max180 m

Depth min0 m

05DNA & barcoding4 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Antedon serrata has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens4

BINs1

Marker genes4

eDNA detections1

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P16S18S28S

animal barcoderibosomalmarker

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type133 records

Wild obs. + sensor15

Museum / vouchered118

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO172 km²

Depth

0–200 m sunlit1

200–1000 m twilight0

1–4 km midnight0

>4 km abyssal0

median 18 m · max 18 m · 1 record with depth

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤1 km 2

2 georeferenced · 13 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor15

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 118 records without

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence118

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions1 of 4 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korealocation not on record	56
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record	3
Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	1
Washington, US	1

4 institutions · 61 of 118 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Antedon serrata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.