Antalis inaequicostata is een Scaphopodasoort uit de familie van de Dentaliidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1891 door Dautzenberg.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Antalis inaequicostata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens5
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections5
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P18S-5P
animal barcoderibosomal
07Deep time~193 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin193 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard periods (Jurassic, Cretaceous…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. The dashed rules marked ✦ are the five great mass extinctions. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock originmass extinction
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 587 records
Wild obs. + sensor635
Museum / vouchered633
Fossil6
Other313
Origin
Native74
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 556 km²
Depth
0–200 m sunlit266
200–1000 m twilight1
1–4 km midnight0
>4 km abyssal0
median 20.9 m · max 201 m · 267 records with depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy97% within 1 km
≤100 m 91≤1 km 174≤10 km 4>10 km 3
272 georeferenced · 363 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor635
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy43% within 1 km
≤100 m 7≤1 km 44≤10 km 59>10 km 9
119 georeferenced · 514 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence633
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions8 of 27 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Israel Oceanographic & Limnological Research, Ltd. The National Institute of Oceanographylocation not on record
153
Laboratoria di biologia marina di Triestelocation not on record
93
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
86
Institut Francais pour l'Etude de la Merlocation not on record
49
486location not on record
39
Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls-Sur-Mer; Laboratoire d'Océanographie Biologiquelocation not on record
37
ICM-CSIClocation not on record
30
Cambridge, US
23
Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503)location not on record
19
Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503) Université de Liège Underwater research and oceanographic station (4501)location not on record
10
Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503) Phaxas Expertise Of Marine Fauna (4507) Université de Liège Underwater research and oceanographic station (4501)location not on record
9
Barcelona, ES
7
Hellenic Centre of Marine Research; Institute for Oceanographylocation not on record
6
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
5
Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503) Phaxas Expertise Of Marine Fauna (4507)location not on record
5
Paris, FR
4
Philadelphia, US
4
CSIC-CEAB Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (1393) Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503) Phaxas Expertise Of Marine Fauna (4507) Université de Liège Underwater research and oceanographic station (4501)location not on record
3
AUTHlocation not on record
3
Auckland, NZ
2
Stockholm, SE
2
Université de Liège Underwater research and oceanographic station (4501)location not on record
1
CSIC-CEAB Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (1393) Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503)location not on record
1
CSIC-CEAB Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (1393) Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503) Université de Liège Underwater research and oceanographic station (4501)location not on record
1
Denver, US
1
RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record
1
Brussels, BE
1
27 institutions · 595 of 633 vouchered records shown · 2 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Antalis inaequicostata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.