Anotia uhleri

(Van Duzee, 1889) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hemiptera/Derbidae/Anotia

At a glance

Occurrence records265

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens11

eDNA detections11

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Anotia uhleri's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility265 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI11 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics11 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF265 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries11 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD11 specimens

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding11 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anotia uhleri has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens11

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections11

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type265 records

Wild obs. + sensor235

Museum / vouchered30

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO796 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy67% within 1 km

≤100 m 96≤1 km 34≤10 km 9>10 km 55

194 georeferenced · 41 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor235

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 30 records without

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence30

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions1 of 4 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
University of Central Floridalocation not on record	15
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record	5
Mississippi State, US	2
CUlocation not on record	1

4 institutions · 23 of 30 vouchered records shown · 7 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA11 detections

Where the DNA of Anotia uhleri was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found11

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 11 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median19.4 °C 14.5–19.6

Seasonal swing summer↔winter26.4 °C

Max temp (day)24.6 °C 19.8–24.8

Min temp (night)15.5 °C 11.3–15.7

Precipitation79.6 mm/mo 79.6–95.2

Air humidity59.5 % 59.5–61.0

Moisture balance-54.3 mm/mo -54.3–-7.20

Vapour deficit910 Pa 662–922

Wind speed3.50 m/s 3.00–3.50

Cloud cover39.7 % 38.7–48.8

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 10 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)