Anoteropsis litoralis

Vink, 2002 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Arachnida/Araneae/Lycosidae/Anoteropsis

At a glance

Occurrence records291

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens5

eDNA detections3

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Anoteropsis litoralis's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility291 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗

World Spider CatalogNaturhist. Museum Bernworld catalog↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF291 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries3 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD5 specimens

01Narrative

Anoteropsis litoralis is a species of wolf spider that is endemic to New Zealand.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding5 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anoteropsis litoralis has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens5

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections3

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type291 records

Wild obs. + sensor286

Museum / vouchered5

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO448 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy92% within 1 km

≤100 m 70≤1 km 24≤10 km 7>10 km 1

102 georeferenced · 184 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor286

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 2

3 georeferenced · 2 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence5

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 3 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Buenos Aires, AR	2
Auckland, NZ	2
Lincoln University, New Zealand, Department of Pest-Management and Conservation, Entomology Research Collectionlocation not on record	1

3 institutions · 5 of 5 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA3 detections

Where the DNA of Anoteropsis litoralis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found3

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 3 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median16.2 °C 16.2–16.2

Seasonal swing summer↔winter8.80 °C

Max temp (day)19.2 °C

Min temp (night)13.9 °C

Precipitation42.1 mm/mo

Air humidity59.7 %

Vapour deficit742 Pa

Cloud cover34.8 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)