Anoplodactylus viridintestinalis

Animalia/Arthropoda/Pycnogonida/Pantopoda/Phoxichilidiidae/Anoplodactylus

At a glance

Occurrence records83

Data sources7

Biological traits2

DNA specimens2

eDNA detections2

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Anoplodactylus viridintestinalis's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility62 records↗

OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System21 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics2 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Traits & measurements1 literature sources2 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF · OBIS83 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD2 specimens

02Traits & measurements

SourcesSeaLifeBase

Habitat & environment2

Habitat saltwateryes

Habitat zonebenthic

05DNA & barcoding2 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anoplodactylus viridintestinalis has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens2

BINs1

Marker genes2

eDNA detections2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P18S-5P

animal barcoderibosomal

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type83 records

Wild obs. + sensor8

Museum / vouchered75

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO200 km²

Depth

0–200 m sunlit13

200–1000 m twilight0

1–4 km midnight1

>4 km abyssal0

median 4 m · max 1 302.1 m · 14 records with depth

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1

1 georeferenced · 7 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor8

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy82% within 1 km

≤100 m 5≤1 km 4>10 km 2

11 georeferenced · 64 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence75

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 5 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	34
Washington, US	11
CASlocation not on record	8
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record	3
Los Angeles, US	3

5 institutions · 59 of 75 vouchered records shown · 2 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Anoplodactylus viridintestinalis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.