Anoplius marginatus

(Say, 1824) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Pompilidae/Anoplius

At a glance

Occurrence records211

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens15

eDNA detections17

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Anoplius marginatus's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility211 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI17 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics15 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF211 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries17 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD15 specimens

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding15 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anoplius marginatus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens15

BINs3

Marker genes1

eDNA detections17

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type211 records

Museum / vouchered211

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO348 km²

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy26% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 22≤10 km 58>10 km 8

89 georeferenced · 122 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence211

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions5 of 12 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Champaign, US	61
US	56
Cleveland Museum of Natural History, OH (CLEV)location not on record	29
University of Guelphlocation not on record	19
Cambridge, US	18
Universidad Católica de Manizaleslocation not on record	12
Chicago, US	8
Royal Alberta Museum, Invertebrate Zoologylocation not on record	3
College Station, US	2
CUlocation not on record	1
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record	1
Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record	1

12 institutions · 211 of 211 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA17 detections

Where the DNA of Anoplius marginatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found17

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 17 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

Riparian Zone4. Native Grassland | 4.4. Temperate GrasslandMixed habitat4. Native Grassland

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median18.4 °C 15.8–20.6

Seasonal swing summer↔winter26.9 °C

Max temp (day)22.4 °C 21.0–28.1

Min temp (night)13.2 °C 11.6–16.5

Precipitation53.8 mm/mo 33.6–97.8

Air humidity57.0 % 50.0–60.6

Moisture balance-64.7 mm/mo -142–-30.3

Vapour deficit833 Pa 779–1,224

Wind speed3.80 m/s 2.20–5.60

Cloud cover37.6 % 31.1–51.4

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 15 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)