Anitys rubens

(Hoffmann, 1803) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Ptinidae/Anitys

At a glance

Occurrence records287

Data sources6

Biological traits2

DNA specimens3

eDNA detections2

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Anitys rubens's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility287 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources2 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF287 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD3 specimens

01Narrative

Anitys rubens is een keversoort uit de familie klopkevers (Anobiidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1803 door Hoffman.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesPantheon

Diet & foraging2

Feeding guild (adult)omnivore

Feeding guild (larval)saprophagous

05DNA & barcoding3 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anitys rubens has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens3

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections2

Countries3

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type287 records

Wild obs. + sensor185

Museum / vouchered100

Other2

Origin

Native5

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO708 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy84% within 1 km

≤100 m 83≤1 km 72≤10 km 29

184 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor185

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy70% within 1 km

≤100 m 29≤1 km 39≤10 km 27>10 km 2

97 georeferenced · 3 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence100

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions3 of 10 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record	56
Trondheim, NO	8
Helsinki, FI	8
Copenhagen, DK	4
Metsähallituslocation not on record	3
MZLUlocation not on record	3
NTNU-VMlocation not on record	2
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record	2
NCMGlocation not on record	2
LSMlocation not on record	1

10 institutions · 89 of 100 vouchered records shown · 11 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Anitys rubens was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median14.7 °C 11.6–17.8

Seasonal swing summer↔winter15.6 °C

Max temp (day)18.5 °C 14.9–22.0

Min temp (night)10.1 °C 7.00–13.1

Precipitation108 mm/mo 79.3–137

Air humidity59.2 % 58.3–60.2

Moisture balance1.00 mm/mo -51.2–53.3

Vapour deficit708 Pa 554–861

Wind speed3.50 m/s 3.30–3.60

Cloud cover39.9 % 34.9–44.9

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)