Anisoplia austriaca

(Herbst, 1783) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Scarabaeidae/Anisoplia

At a glance

Occurrence records819

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens8

eDNA detections1

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Anisoplia austriaca's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation7 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility819 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics8 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF819 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD8 specimens

01Narrative

Anisoplia austriaca is the binomial name of a species of scarab beetle, a harmful pest of cereal crops. Its body length is 12–16 mm.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding8 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anisoplia austriaca has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens8

BINs3

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Countries3

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus7 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 89% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)5.7%

Haplotypes2

BINs3

Most divergent pair9.0%

Where individuals differ — all 72 variable positions, in barcode order

19Cmostly conserved

31Tmostly conserved

50Cvariable

56Cvariable

59Tmostly conserved

67Avariable

73Avariable

74Cvariable

76Avariable

82Cmostly conserved

85Cvariable

103Tmostly conserved

115Tmostly conserved

118Tvariable

127Avariable

133Tmostly conserved

142Cvariable

157Tvariable

184Avariable

202Cmostly conserved

206Tvariable

211Avariable

212Cvariable

214Tvariable

217Cvariable

238Cvariable

250Tmostly conserved

253Gvariable

266Tvariable

271Cvariable

274Tmostly conserved

283Tvariable

286Cvariable

289Tvariable

301Avariable

305Gvariable

307Avariable

316Tvariable

340Cvariable

343Cvariable

346Avariable

373Cvariable

400Avariable

421Tmostly conserved

436Avariable

463Tvariable

469Avariable

472Tvariable

474Tvariable

481Amostly conserved

483Gvariable

494Gvariable

499Tvariable

519Tvariable

520Amostly conserved

521Tvariable

526Tvariable

529Tvariable

532Tvariable

557Tvariable

565Amostly conserved

574Avariable

577Avariable

604Tmostly conserved

607Avariable

616Tvariable

619Tvariable

622Avariable

628Gvariable

631Tmostly conserved

634Cvariable

652Cvariable

AACTTTATACTTTTTATTCGGAAGTTGGGCTGGAATAGTAGGAACATCCCTAAGACTATTAATTCGAGCAGAACTAGGAAACCCCGGATC …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Anisoplia latasame genus2.9%Anisoplia agricolasame genus3.8%Brancoplia leucaspissame family9.9%Chaetopteroplia segetumsame family10.8%Phyllopertha horticolasame family11.9%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type819 records

Wild obs. + sensor709

Museum / vouchered87

Other23

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO2 500 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy78% within 1 km

≤100 m 259≤1 km 116≤10 km 84>10 km 21

480 georeferenced · 229 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor709

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy53% within 1 km

≤100 m 5≤1 km 32≤10 km 19>10 km 14

70 georeferenced · 17 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence87

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 9 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record	18
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record	11
NTNU-VMlocation not on record	9
Tartu, EE	3
ASUlocation not on record	3
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record	2
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record	1
Tilburg, NL	1
MZLUlocation not on record	1

9 institutions · 49 of 87 vouchered records shown · 38 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Anisoplia austriaca was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median16.7 °C 16.7–16.7

Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.5 °C

Max temp (day)21.8 °C

Min temp (night)10.2 °C

Precipitation35.1 mm/mo

Air humidity51.6 %

Moisture balance-124 mm/mo

Vapour deficit918 Pa

Wind speed2.90 m/s

Cloud cover33.3 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)