De brede roodkruin is een keversoort uit de familie van de loopkevers (Carabidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort werd in 1796 gepubliceerd door Georg Wolfgang Franz Panzer.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anisodactylus signatus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens7
BINs2
Marker genes1
eDNA detections11
Countries4
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus6 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 90% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Diversity (π)3.4%
Haplotypes2
BINs2
Most divergent pair9.3%
Where individuals differ — all 63 variable positions, in barcode order
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · TreeOfSex
The complete instruction manualAnisodactylus signatus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy11% within 1 km
≤100 m 226≤1 km 44≤10 km 2 114>10 km 3
2 387 georeferenced · 145 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 532
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy25% within 1 km
≤100 m 131≤1 km 51≤10 km 527>10 km 13
722 georeferenced · 440 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 162
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions17 of 46 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Chiba, JP
186
FEBlocation not on record
113
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
99
Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau Frick | Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Fricklocation not on record
36
Kushiro City Museumlocation not on record
33
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
30
LEBAlocation not on record
26
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
24
Yamaguchi-shi, JP
23
Bern, CH
20
Geneva, CH
14
Sagamihara, JP
13
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
12
Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
12
Itami Shi, JP
11
RCMlocation not on record
10
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
9
KCMNlocation not on record
9
Iwate Prefectural Museumlocation not on record
9
�������� ����� ����location not on record
9
Veterinary Laboratory Agencylocation not on record
8
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
8
Montpellier, FR
6
Bando, JP
6
EIBElocation not on record
6
NMOKlocation not on record
5
NSMKlocation not on record
5
Tokushima, JP
5
Washington, US
4
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
4
Department of Microbiology, Prince of Songkla Universitylocation not on record
4
HAFLlocation not on record
4
Naturmuseum Solothurnlocation not on record
3
Tomioka, JP
3
Tartu, EE
3
HUNMlocation not on record
3
ZIBElocation not on record
2
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
2
Ghent, BE
2
ZSMlocation not on record
2
Paro, BT
2
EGBlocation not on record
1
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
1
Helsinki, FI
1
Toyama, JP
1
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - AGROSAVIAlocation not on record
1
46 institutions · 790 of 1 162 vouchered records shown · 372 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA11 detections
Where the DNA of Anisodactylus signatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found11
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 11 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median19.9 °C 9.00–26.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.9 °C
Max temp (day)22.7 °C 12.8–27.8
Min temp (night)17.4 °C 4.70–24.1
Precipitation117 mm/mo 83.1–462
Air humidity62.7 % 58.4–71.0
Moisture balance71.9 mm/mo -33.2–314
Vapour deficit952 Pa 511–1,055
Wind speed2.40 m/s 2.40–3.30
Cloud cover36.4 % 32.4–49.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 7 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.