Anelaphus pumilus — The Life Data

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Cerambycidae/Anelaphus

At a glance

Occurrence records579

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens3

eDNA detections1

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Anelaphus pumilus's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation5 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility579 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF579 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD3 specimens

01Narrative

Anelaphus pumilus is a species of beetle in the family Cerambycidae. It was described by Newman in 1840.Bezark, Larry G. A Photographic Catalog of the Cerambycidae of the World . Retrieved on 22 May 2012.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding3 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anelaphus pumilus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens3

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type579 records

Wild obs. + sensor480

Museum / vouchered99

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO1 320 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy87% within 1 km

≤100 m 280≤1 km 76≤10 km 10>10 km 45

411 georeferenced · 69 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor480

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy66% within 1 km

≤100 m 24≤1 km 1≤10 km 12>10 km 1

38 georeferenced · 61 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence99

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions7 of 12 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Champaign, US	32
Wuzhou, CN	18
University of Central Floridalocation not on record	16
College Station, US	13
CUlocation not on record	7
Lexington, US	3
OSUClocation not on record	2
MAJClocation not on record	2
Lubbock, US	1
Montgomery, US	1
University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record	1
Lake Placid, US	1

12 institutions · 97 of 99 vouchered records shown · 2 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Anelaphus pumilus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.