A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Androsace lactea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens10
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences4
eDNA detections5
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL1★rbcLa★trnL★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type3 727 records
Wild obs. + sensor3 072
Museum / vouchered476
Cultivated / captive2
Other177
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 416 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy38% within 1 km
≤100 m 116≤1 km 848≤10 km 1 551>10 km 11
2 526 georeferenced · 546 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 072
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy44% within 1 km
≤100 m 23≤1 km 101≤10 km 156>10 km 1
281 georeferenced · 195 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence476
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km
≤1 km 2
2 georeferenced
Open the mapnot free-living2
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions22 of 40 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
GJOlocation not on record
76
Bern, CH
51
BFLlocation not on record
41
LDlocation not on record
35
Salzburg, AT
29
Zürich, CH
27
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
24
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
22
Zürich, CH
20
Oskarshamn, SE
18
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
17
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
12
inatura Erlebnis Naturschau GmbHlocation not on record
11
SZUlocation not on record
11
Paris, FR
8
Porrentruy, CH
8
BRNUlocation not on record
8
Wlocation not on record
7
LfUlocation not on record
6
MAlocation not on record
4
Wellington, NZ
3
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
3
Uniwersytet Opolskilocation not on record
3
Sion, CH
2
Mlocation not on record
2
Görlitz, DE
2
Fribourg, CH
2
Gijón, ES
2
València, ES
2
Dresden, DE
1
Kew, GB
1
Berlin, DE
1
Frankfurt am Main
1
Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkunde Karlsruhe (State Museum of Natural History)location not on record
1
Granada, ES
1
Vitoria, ES
1
Barcelona, ES
1
Vancouver, CA
1
Bourges, FR
1
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
1
40 institutions · 467 of 476 vouchered records shown · 8 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Androsace lactea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.