Andrena surda

Cockerell, 1910 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Andrenidae/Andrena

At a glance

Occurrence records117

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens9

eDNA detections5

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Andrena surda's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility117 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI5 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics9 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF117 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries5 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD9 specimens

01Narrative

Andrena surda is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie Andrenidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1910 door Cockerell.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding9 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena surda has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens9

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections5

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type117 records

Wild obs. + sensor2

Museum / vouchered115

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO312 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy50% within 1 km

≤100 m 1>10 km 1

2 georeferenced

Open the mapobservation + sensor2

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy46% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 12≤10 km 15

28 georeferenced · 87 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence115

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions5 of 14 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Beltsville, US	49
Champaign, US	13
Universidad Católica de Manizaleslocation not on record	12
	11
Roberts Creek, CA	9
Weber State University, Bird and Mammal Collectionlocation not on record	5
WIlocation not on record	4
Vancouver, CA	3
Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record	2
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record	2
Royal British Columbia Museumlocation not on record	2
Oregon State University, Oregon State Arthropod Collectionlocation not on record	1
OSUClocation not on record	1
Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record	1

14 institutions · 115 of 115 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA5 detections

Where the DNA of Andrena surda was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found5

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 5 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

Sloping benchland above lakeside silt cliffs…

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median19.5 °C 16.6–22.0

Seasonal swing summer↔winter24.9 °C

Max temp (day)26.6 °C 23.6–28.7

Min temp (night)12.9 °C 10.6–15.1

Precipitation32.3 mm/mo 23.1–33.8

Air humidity50.7 % 48.9–52.1

Moisture balance-115 mm/mo -136–-99.6

Vapour deficit1,128 Pa 937–1,345

Wind speed3.00 m/s 2.50–4.10

Cloud cover33.8 % 32.1–35.3

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)