Ancylandrena larreae — The Life Data

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Andrenidae/Ancylandrena

At a glance

Occurrence records714

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens5

eDNA detections2

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Ancylandrena larreae's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility714 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF714 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD5 specimens

01Narrative

Ancylandrena larreae, the creosote bush ancylandrena, is a species of mining bee in the family Andrenidae. It is found in Central America and North America.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding5 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ancylandrena larreae has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens5

Marker genes2

eDNA detections2

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P18S-5P

animal barcoderibosomal

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type714 records

Wild obs. + sensor6

Museum / vouchered708

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO552 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 2≤1 km 3

5 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor6

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy6% within 1 km

≤1 km 10≤10 km 25>10 km 138

173 georeferenced · 535 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence708

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions5 of 9 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Beltsville, US	361
Essig Museum of Entomologylocation not on record	153
Wuzhou, CN	100
	63
Champaign, US	15
Washington, US	8
University of Alabamalocation not on record	5
ASUlocation not on record	1
University of Arizona, Insect Collectionlocation not on record	1

9 institutions · 707 of 708 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Ancylandrena larreae was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.