Anchiphiloscia pilosa

(Budde-Lund, 1913) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Malacostraca/Isopoda/Philosciidae/Anchiphiloscia

At a glance

Occurrence records6

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens2

eDNA detections3

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Anchiphiloscia pilosa's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility6 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics2 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF6 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries3 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD2 specimens

01Narrative

Anchiphiloscia pilosa is een pissebed uit de familie Philosciidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1913 door Gustav Budde-Lund.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding2 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anchiphiloscia pilosa has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens2

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections3

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type6 records

Wild obs. + sensor1

Museum / vouchered5

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO12 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1

1 georeferenced

Open the mapobservation + sensor1

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 5 records without

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence5

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions1 of 1 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Frankfurt am Main	5

1 institutions · 5 of 5 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA3 detections

Where the DNA of Anchiphiloscia pilosa was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found3

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 3 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

Pandanus tectorius

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median26.7 °C 26.7–26.7

Seasonal swing summer↔winter0.6 °C

Max temp (day)27.6 °C

Min temp (night)25.9 °C

Precipitation339 mm/mo 296–383

Air humidity63.1 % 62.8–63.4

Moisture balance158 mm/mo 115–202

Vapour deficit1,292 Pa 1,280–1,304

Wind speed3.60 m/s 3.50–3.60

Cloud cover39.1 % 37.9–40.4

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)