Anastrangalia sanguinolenta is a species of flower longhorn beetles belonging to the family Cerambycidae, subfamily Lepturinae. Anastrangalia sanguinolenta This beetle is a common species present in most of Europe and in the Near Eastern countries such as Caucasus, Transcaucasia, and Turkey, where they mainly inhabit mountainous coniferous forests.Distribution and life cycle Head, antennae and pronotum are black in both sexes, while elytra are reddish-brown in the female and yellowish-brown in the male.Gender and colour The adults grow up to 8 - and can be encountered from May through August, completing their life cycle in 2–3 years. The larvae develop at the expense of various species of conifers, mainly within dead wood of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. The adults visit flowers for nectar and pollen.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anastrangalia sanguinolenta has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens154
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections209
Countries11
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus151 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 97% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 20 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens. Showing the 28 commonest of 77 variants.
Diversity (π)0.89%
Haplotypes77
BIN1
Most divergent pair2.3%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P18S-5P
animal barcoderibosomal
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type20 783 records
Wild obs. + sensor14 880
Museum / vouchered5 676
Cultivated / captive3
Other224
Origin
Native2 529
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO34 244 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy61% within 1 km
≤100 m 5 329≤1 km 3 064≤10 km 5 098>10 km 191
13 682 georeferenced · 1 198 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor14 880
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy22% within 1 km
≤100 m 531≤1 km 613≤10 km 3 963>10 km 107
5 214 georeferenced · 462 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence5 676
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 3 records without
Open the mapnot free-living3
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions24 of 68 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
1 064
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
502
Geneva, CH
230
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
178
Paro, BT
171
Bern, CH
167
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
158
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
157
NHMOlocation not on record
111
Stockholm, SE
110
Zürich, CH
102
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
94
Tromsø, NO
93
Helsinki, FI
92
Trondheim, NO
89
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
78
Vitoria, ES
78
Tartu, EE
77
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
71
Dhaka, BD
70
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
68
NEFlocation not on record
65
Metsähallituslocation not on record
57
Olocation not on record
57
Salzburg, AT
54
Fribourg, CH
47
BioFokuslocation not on record
46
Frauenfeld, CH
37
NMOKlocation not on record
27
neflocation not on record
24
European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record
22
Naturmuseum St. Gallenlocation not on record
16
Nijmegen, NL
15
Oulu, FI
14
Philadelphia, US
11
South Kensington, GB
11
Sion, CH
10
MSNMlocation not on record
10
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
10
ZMAAlocation not on record
10
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
9
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
9
Musée de l'Hospice du Grand-Saint-Bernardlocation not on record
9
Tilburg, NL
8
TMPMlocation not on record
8
Naturmuseum Oltenlocation not on record
8
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
8
IZNElocation not on record
7
Brussels, BE
7
ZSMlocation not on record
7
Ugentlocation not on record
7
4
Kuopio, FI
4
Tallinn, EE
3
CBDClocation not on record
3
GVlocation not on record
3
MZLUlocation not on record
2
Archäologie und Museum Baselland - Museum.BLlocation not on record
2
MUZOO - Musée d'histoire naturelle de La Chaux-de-Fondslocation not on record
2
Naturmuseum Solothurnlocation not on record
2
Department of Molecular Biodiversity, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals of the Polish Academy of Scienceslocation not on record
2
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record
2
Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record
1
Private Collection of H. Haraldseidelocation not on record
1
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU)location not on record
1
NCMGlocation not on record
1
UGRlocation not on record
1
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
68 institutions · 4 425 of 5 676 vouchered records shown · 1 251 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA209 detections
Where the DNA of Anastrangalia sanguinolenta was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found209
Studies independent surveys3
Countries11
Verifiable raw sequence linked55
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 209 detections have coordinates
Open the map11 countries0
dry Pinus forestNadelwaldForestTrockener MischwaldHalbtrockenrasen, Trockenwaldaus der Veghetation geklopft und gekeschert
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.5 °C 10.0–18.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.1 °C
Max temp (day)19.2 °C 14.1–22.9
Min temp (night)10.9 °C 5.20–13.8
Precipitation74.5 mm/mo 36.8–140
Air humidity58.5 % 55.4–62.4
Moisture balance-48.2 mm/mo -123–34.8
Vapour deficit720 Pa 494–917
Wind speed3.10 m/s 2.10–4.30
Cloud cover37.5 % 35.2–51.3
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 208 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.