De spurrie-uil is een nachtvlinder uit de familie Noctuidae (uilen). De voorvleugellengte bedraagt tussen de 14 en 18 millimeter. De soort komt voor in heel Europa. Hij overwintert als pop.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anarta trifolii has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens249
BINs6
Marker genes1
eDNA detections260
Countries23
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P656 bp consensus243 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 96% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 26 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)1.3%
Haplotypes26
BINs6
Most divergent pair5.3%
EuropeN.AmericaAsiaOther
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
Organelle genome
Besides the big genome in the nucleus, cells carry a small, circular loop of DNA inside the cell's energy factories — the mitochondria. It is inherited almost only from the mother and is a leftover from ancient bacteria that moved into the cell. The mitochondrial markers above (ND*, COX, CYTB…) are read from exactly this loop. Outer ring = one strand, inner ring = the other.
▸ Tap any coloured segment — or a gene chip — to see what it is
◖ violet arc = the COI-5P barcode — the ~650 bp read used to ID this species
Pick a coloured segment on the ring — or a gene chip — to read what that gene does.
protein-codingrRNAtRNA
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualAnarta trifolii carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈633 979 078 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Anarta trifolii0.63 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
Completeness99.6% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type113 779 records
Wild obs. + sensor105 190
Museum / vouchered7 631
Other958
Origin
Native1 804
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO51 948 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy24% within 1 km
≤100 m 18 471≤1 km 5 515≤10 km 77 246>10 km 479
101 711 georeferenced · 3 479 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor105 190
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy76% within 1 km
≤100 m 3 973≤1 km 623≤10 km 1 292>10 km 171
6 059 georeferenced · 1 572 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence7 631
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions26 of 58 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
DanishLepidopterologicalSocietylocation not on record
3 955
Helsinki, FI
1 006
UMUlocation not on record
288
St. Paul, US
202
East Lansing, US
192
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
162
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
152
Vernal, US
124
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
119
NHMOlocation not on record
117
University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record
105
Tartu, EE
104
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
78
New Haven, US
64
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
62
Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record
62
ZMAAlocation not on record
53
MZLUlocation not on record
46
Kuopio, FI
41
NMOKlocation not on record
40
Oregon State Arthropod Collectionlocation not on record
38
King Saud Universitylocation not on record
23
Nijmegen, NL
22
ASUlocation not on record
18
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
15
US
12
ZSMlocation not on record
10
John May Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
10
Philadelphia, US
8
Philadelphia, US
6
CBDClocation not on record
6
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
6
Tallinn, EE
6
Toronto, CA
5
UDlocation not on record
5
Metsähallituslocation not on record
4
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record
3
San Diego, US
3
San Francisco, US
3
WWUlocation not on record
3
Washington, US
3
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
2
Awka, NG
2
Decorah, US
2
South Kensington, GB
2
Edmonton, CA
2
Zürich, CH
2
BioFokuslocation not on record
1
Brussels, BE
1
München, DE
1
Research Collection of Daniel Handfieldlocation not on record
1
Rovaniemi, FI
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record
1
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
1
neflocation not on record
1
Albuquerque, US
1
KWPlocation not on record
1
58 institutions · 7 204 of 7 631 vouchered records shown · 427 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA260 detections
Where the DNA of Anarta trifolii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found260
Studies independent surveys3
Countries22
Verifiable raw sequence linked9
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median17.0 °C 8.60–23.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.3 °C
Max temp (day)20.9 °C 12.4–29.6
Min temp (night)12.7 °C 4.80–17.0
Precipitation59.7 mm/mo 21.1–106
Air humidity57.7 % 46.8–62.6
Moisture balance-49.1 mm/mo -139–8.40
Vapour deficit844 Pa 472–1,519
Wind speed3.30 m/s 1.80–5.30
Cloud cover37.4 % 21.1–47.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 148 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility113 779 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI260 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics249 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗