Anarsia eleagnella — The Life Data

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Lepidoptera/Gelechiidae/Anarsia

At a glance

Occurrence records7

Data sources8

Biological traits0

DNA specimens2

eDNA detections1

Sources8 archives

Databases and archives Anarsia eleagnella's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility7 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics2 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF7 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD2 specimens

01Narrative

Anarsia eleagnella is a moth of the family Gelechiidae. It is found in Hungary, Romania, Ukraine, Russia,Fauna Europaea Transcaucasia, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Afghanistan.Anarsia at funet The larvae feed on Elaeagnus species.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding2 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anarsia eleagnella has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens2

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type7 records

Wild obs. + sensor4

Museum / vouchered3

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO24 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy67% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 1>10 km 1

3 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor4

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 3 records without

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence3

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Institution	Specimens
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record	2

1 institutions · 2 of 3 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Anarsia eleagnella was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median16.5 °C 16.5–16.5

Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.2 °C

Max temp (day)21.2 °C

Min temp (night)12.4 °C

Precipitation48.6 mm/mo

Air humidity57.7 %

Moisture balance-41.2 mm/mo

Vapour deficit793 Pa

Wind speed3.40 m/s

Cloud cover41.5 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.