Rochinia hystrix is een krabbensoort uit de familie van de Epialtidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1871 door Stimpson.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anamathia hystrix has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
eDNA detections1
Countries1
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type121 records
Wild obs. + sensor9
Museum / vouchered112
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO292 km²
Depth
0–200 m sunlit2
200–1000 m twilight20
1–4 km midnight0
>4 km abyssal0
median 404.2 m · max 686 m · 22 records with depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
≤10 km 1>10 km 2
3 georeferenced · 6 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor9
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy25% within 1 km
≤1 km 1≤10 km 3
4 georeferenced · 108 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence112
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions2 of 3 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
College Station, US
33
Cambridge, US
28
ARMS-MBONlocation not on record
1
3 institutions · 62 of 112 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Anamathia hystrix was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Verifiable raw sequence linked1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
Marine Protected Area; protected; 9.2 - Subt…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median11.7 °C 11.7–11.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.2 °C
Max temp (day)13.4 °C
Min temp (night)7.60 °C
Precipitation93.5 mm/mo
Air humidity60.7 %
Moisture balance-13.0 mm/mo
Vapour deficit542 Pa
Wind speed3.80 m/s
Cloud cover63.3 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
