Anadara diluvii — The Life Data

Animalia/Mollusca/Bivalvia/Arcida/Arcidae/Anadara

At a glance

Occurrence records374

Data sources7

Biological traits4

DNA specimens1

eDNA detections1

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Anadara diluvii's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility343 records↗

OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System31 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics1 specimens↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources4 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF · OBIS374 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD1 specimens

01Narrative

Anadara diluvii is an extinct species of saltwater bivalves, ark clams, in the family Arcidae.World Register of Marine Species Fossil shell

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesSeaLifeBase

Habitat & environment2

Habitat saltwateryes

Habitat zonebenthic

Other traits2

Depth max500 m

Depth min5 m

05DNA & barcoding1 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anadara diluvii has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type374 records

Wild obs. + sensor220

Museum / vouchered14

Fossil113

Other27

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO252 km²

Depth

0–200 m sunlit27

200–1000 m twilight2

1–4 km midnight0

>4 km abyssal0

median 77 m · max 694 m · 29 records with depth

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤1 km 12

12 georeferenced · 208 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor220

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy29% within 1 km

≤1 km 2≤10 km 1>10 km 4

7 georeferenced · 7 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence14

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 7 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Turkmen Agricultural University named after S.A. Niyazovlocation not on record	4
Cambridge, US	3
Brussels, BE	2
RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record	2
IEO-COMA-CSIClocation not on record	1
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	1
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record	1

7 institutions · 14 of 14 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Anadara diluvii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.