Amphinema rugosum

(Mayer, 1900) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Cnidaria/Hydrozoa/Anthoathecata/Pandeidae/Amphinema

At a glance

Occurrence records160

Data sources7

Biological traits6

DNA specimens5

eDNA detections2

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Amphinema rugosum's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility78 records↗

OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System82 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources6 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF · OBIS160 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD5 specimens

01Narrative

Amphinema rugosum is een hydroïdpoliep uit de familie Pandeidae. De poliep komt uit het geslacht Amphinema. Amphinema rugosum werd in 1900 voor het eerst wetenschappelijk beschreven door Mayer.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesSeaLifeBase

Size & morphology1

Body length0.3 cm

Habitat & environment2

Habitat saltwateryes

Habitat zonepelagic

Other traits3

Depth max140 m

Depth min0 m

Vulnerability10

05DNA & barcoding5 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amphinema rugosum has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens5

BINs2

Marker genes2

eDNA detections2

Countries1

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus3 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 88% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)7.8%

Haplotypes2

BINs2

Most divergent pair11.7%

Where individuals differ — all 77 variable positions, in barcode order

1Tvariable

5Cvariable

13Avariable

14Avariable

31Tvariable

34Tvariable

46Avariable

52Avariable

64Cvariable

74Cvariable

76Avariable

82Cvariable

88Tvariable

91Avariable

100Gvariable

103Cvariable

106Cvariable

109Tvariable

118Cvariable

127Avariable

160Gvariable

181Gvariable

184Avariable

190Tvariable

196Avariable

200Avariable

202Cvariable

242Cvariable

250Cvariable

256Cvariable

262Gvariable

265Avariable

283Cvariable

292Gvariable

295Avariable

301Cvariable

307Avariable

322Tvariable

328Gvariable

331Avariable

337Avariable

346Tvariable

355Cvariable

358Cvariable

373Gvariable

382Avariable

385Cvariable

391Tvariable

427Tvariable

463Cvariable

478Gvariable

481Avariable

499Cvariable

502Gvariable

505Tvariable

511Gvariable

517Tvariable

518Cvariable

526Tvariable

532Tvariable

539Tvariable

542Tvariable

547Avariable

556Tvariable

557Cvariable

562Avariable

565Tvariable

568Cvariable

580Tvariable

581Tvariable

586Tvariable

589Tvariable

601Cvariable

616Cvariable

619Cvariable

628Avariable

646Cvariable

TACACTATACATAATATTTGGAGCATTTTCTGGTATGGTAGGAACAGCATTAAGTATGTTAATCAGACTAGAACTAACAACCCCAGGTGC …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Malagazzia taeniogoniasame order15.5%Amphinema dinemasame genus15.9%Blackfordia polytentaculatasame order16.1%Catablema vesicariumsame family16.3%Opercularella laceratasame order16.6%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P16S

animal barcoderibosomal

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type160 records

Wild obs. + sensor52

Museum / vouchered52

Other56

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO288 km²

Depth

0–200 m sunlit58

200–1000 m twilight0

1–4 km midnight0

>4 km abyssal0

median 36.5 m · max 200 m · 58 records with depth

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 8≤1 km 20

28 georeferenced · 24 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor52

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy95% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 20>10 km 1

22 georeferenced · 30 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence52

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions4 of 9 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Brussels, BE	7
Washington, US	5
RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record	5
South Kensington, GB	3
Earth Sciences New Zealandlocation not on record	2
Tapachula, MX	1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record	1
IPMAlocation not on record	1
University of California San Diegolocation not on record	1

9 institutions · 26 of 52 vouchered records shown · 2 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Amphinema rugosum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median12.3 °C 10.1–14.5

Seasonal swing summer↔winter12.8 °C

Max temp (day)13.9 °C 11.2–16.5

Min temp (night)9.60 °C 8.80–10.4

Precipitation113 mm/mo 64.5–160

Air humidity64.3 % 63.8–64.7

Vapour deficit518 Pa 449–587

Cloud cover60.0 % 55.8–64.2

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)