Amphilius nigricaudatus is een straalvinnige vissensoort uit de familie van de kuilwangmeervallen (Amphiliidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1909 door Pellegrin.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amphilius nigricaudatus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
BINs1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections2
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type32 records
Museum / vouchered32
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO104 km²
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
≤10 km 1
1 georeferenced · 31 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence32
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions2 of 5 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Royal Museum for Central Africalocation not on record
19
Oregon State Universitylocation not on record
9
Paris, FR
1
Cambridge, US
1
South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversitylocation not on record
1
5 institutions · 31 of 32 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Amphilius nigricaudatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median21.2 °C 21.2–21.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter4.30 °C
Max temp (day)25.6 °C
Min temp (night)17.8 °C
Precipitation10.7 mm/mo
Air humidity67.9 %
Moisture balance-66.3 mm/mo
Vapour deficit801 Pa
Wind speed0.9 m/s
Cloud cover53.2 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
