De zwartpuntkniptor is een keversoort uit de familie kniptorren (Elateridae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1792 door Fabricius.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ampedus praeustus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens17
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections1
Countries2
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus10 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 98% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 13 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.72%
Haplotypes4
BIN1
Most divergent pair1.4%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P★ITS2
animal barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 621 records
Wild obs. + sensor878
Museum / vouchered549
Fossil3
Other191
Origin
Native149
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 000 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy49% within 1 km
≤100 m 259≤1 km 89≤10 km 344>10 km 19
711 georeferenced · 167 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor878
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy39% within 1 km
≤100 m 88≤1 km 107≤10 km 290>10 km 14
499 georeferenced · 50 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence549
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions18 of 38 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
100
Trondheim, NO
24
Tallinn, EE
22
MZLUlocation not on record
22
Tartu, EE
17
Dhaka, BD
16
Philadelphia, US
14
Bern, CH
13
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
11
Metsähallituslocation not on record
9
Olocation not on record
8
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
8
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
7
NHMOlocation not on record
7
Copenhagen, DK
6
Salzburg, AT
6
Fribourg, CH
6
BioFokuslocation not on record
6
Helsinki, FI
6
Geneva, CH
4
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
4
Paro, BT
4
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
3
Paris, FR
3
neflocation not on record
3
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
2
Frauenfeld, CH
2
Sion, CH
2
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record
2
Oulu, FI
1
Kuopio, FI
1
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
1
Hannam Universitylocation not on record
1
Cornell University Insect Collectionlocation not on record
1
LSMlocation not on record
1
University Park, US
1
BCLIlocation not on record
1
Musee cantonal de zoologie de Lausannelocation not on record
1
38 institutions · 346 of 549 vouchered records shown · 203 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Ampedus praeustus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median2.20 °C 2.20–2.20
Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.9 °C
Max temp (day)7.70 °C
Min temp (night)-3.60 °C
Precipitation124 mm/mo
Air humidity60.7 %
Moisture balance64.8 mm/mo
Vapour deficit286 Pa
Wind speed3.60 m/s
Cloud cover46.7 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 621 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics17 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗