Ampedus erythrogonus ist ein Käfer aus der Familie der Schnellkäfer (Elateridae) und der Unterfamilie der Ampedinae. Der Artname erythrogonus kommt aus dem Griechischen und bedeutet nach Sigmund Schenkling „mit rotem Knie“.Sigmund Schenkling: Erklärung der wissenschaftlichen Käfernamen
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ampedus erythrogonus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens29
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections23
Countries6
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus22 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 100% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 3 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.15%
Haplotypes5
BIN1
Most divergent pair0.46%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P★ITS2
animal barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type5 473 records
Wild obs. + sensor3 379
Museum / vouchered838
Fossil1
Other1 255
Origin
Native613
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 880 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy11% within 1 km
≤100 m 186≤1 km 74≤10 km 2 070>10 km 31
2 361 georeferenced · 1 018 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 379
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy34% within 1 km
≤100 m 151≤1 km 121≤10 km 503>10 km 15
790 georeferenced · 48 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence838
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions16 of 39 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Metsähallituslocation not on record
122
Bern, CH
72
Fribourg, CH
63
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
36
Geneva, CH
35
Paro, BT
34
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
34
Zürich, CH
30
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
29
Helsinki, FI
27
Jyväskylä, FI
24
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
18
Salzburg, AT
17
Tartu, EE
17
Naturmuseum St. Gallenlocation not on record
15
NMOKlocation not on record
14
Dhaka, BD
12
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
11
Copenhagen, DK
10
Tallinn, EE
8
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
7
Kuopio, FI
5
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
5
Archäologie und Museum Baselland - Museum.BLlocation not on record
4
Muséum d'histoire naturelle de Lillelocation not on record
4
Sion, CH
4
ZSMlocation not on record
3
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record
3
TMPMlocation not on record
3
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
3
Philadelphia, US
2
Oulu, FI
2
Department of Molecular Biodiversity, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals of the Polish Academy of Scienceslocation not on record
2
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
2
Museo civico Brancaleoni di Piobbicolocation not on record
2
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
2
MZLUlocation not on record
2
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
1
Cornell University Insect Collectionlocation not on record
1
39 institutions · 685 of 838 vouchered records shown · 153 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA23 detections
Where the DNA of Ampedus erythrogonus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found23
Studies independent surveys1
Countries6
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 23 detections have coordinates
Open the map6 countries0
von Totholz und aus der Vegetation geklopftForest
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.6 °C 8.00–15.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter17.3 °C
Max temp (day)17.5 °C 11.5–19.4
Min temp (night)9.30 °C 3.40–10.7
Precipitation83.3 mm/mo 72.3–166
Air humidity60.0 % 58.6–63.8
Moisture balance-7.60 mm/mo -40.1–94.2
Vapour deficit613 Pa 399–708
Wind speed3.40 m/s 2.10–3.90
Cloud cover40.9 % 33.8–45.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 22 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility5 473 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI23 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics29 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗