Ammoxenus pentheri — The Life Data

Animalia/Arthropoda/Arachnida/Araneae/Gnaphosidae/Ammoxenus

At a glance

Occurrence records5

Data sources7

Biological traits1

DNA specimens4

eDNA detections3

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Ammoxenus pentheri's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility5 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics4 specimens↗

World Spider Trait DBMasaryk University1 traits · 1 refs↗

World Spider CatalogNaturhist. Museum Bernworld catalog↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources1 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF5 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries3 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD4 specimens

01Narrative

Ammoxenus pentheri est une espèce d'araignées aranéomorphes de la famille des Gnaphosidae.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesPekár et al. 2012a

Predation1

Prey diversity1 mm

05DNA & barcoding4 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ammoxenus pentheri has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens4

BINs3

Marker genes1

eDNA detections3

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type5 records

Wild obs. + sensor1

Museum / vouchered4

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO20 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without

Open the mapobservation + sensor1

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 4 records without

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence4

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Institution	Specimens
Royal Museum for Central Africalocation not on record	3
Agricultural Research Council, Plant Protection Research Institute, National Collection of Arachnidalocation not on record	1

2 institutions · 4 of 4 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA3 detections

Where the DNA of Ammoxenus pentheri was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found3

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 3 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median13.2 °C 13.2–18.4

Seasonal swing summer↔winter11.0 °C

Max temp (day)20.2 °C 20.2–25.6

Min temp (night)6.20 °C 6.20–10.7

Precipitation31.9 mm/mo 31.5–31.9

Air humidity56.1 % 52.5–56.1

Moisture balance-101 mm/mo -130–-101

Vapour deficit667 Pa 667–1,028

Wind speed6.60 m/s 5.20–6.60

Cloud cover14.2 % 14.2–19.5

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.