Ammophila cleopatra

Menke, 1964 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Sphecidae/Ammophila

At a glance

Occurrence records237

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens9

eDNA detections4

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Ammophila cleopatra's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility237 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI4 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics9 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF237 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries4 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD9 specimens

01Narrative

Ammophila cleopatra es una especie de avispa del género Ammophila, familia Sphecidae. (2008) , website, Sphecidae sensu lato site, Individual genus PDF files ITIS Bees: World Bee Checklist. Ruggiero M. (project leader), Ascher J. et al., 2009-09-28 Fue descrito por primera vez en 1964 por Menke.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding9 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ammophila cleopatra has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens9

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections4

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type237 records

Wild obs. + sensor2

Museum / vouchered235

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO284 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1

1 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor2

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy7% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 11≤10 km 70>10 km 79

161 georeferenced · 74 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence235

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions8 of 16 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
San Diego, US	99
University of Guelphlocation not on record	54
ASUlocation not on record	36
Universidad Católica de Manizaleslocation not on record	14
San Francisco, US	6
College Station, US	5
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record	5
EL PASO, US	3
University of Central Floridalocation not on record	3
California State Collection of Arthropodslocation not on record	2
Champaign, US	2
US	1
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record	1
Albuquerque, US	1
Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record	1
Sydney, AU	1

16 institutions · 234 of 235 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA4 detections

Where the DNA of Ammophila cleopatra was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found4

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 4 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

Ponderosa pine, bunchgrass, sagebrush4. Native Grassland

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median0.2 °C 0.2–16.6

Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.9 °C

Max temp (day)5.50 °C 5.50–23.5

Min temp (night)-4.20 °C -4.20–10.7

Precipitation46.4 mm/mo 26.8–46.4

Air humidity60.1 % 53.3–60.1

Moisture balance11.2 mm/mo -73.4–11.2

Vapour deficit250 Pa 250–993

Wind speed2.20 m/s 2.20–2.40

Cloud cover44.7 % 36.0–44.7

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)