Ammopelmatus fuscus

(Haldeman, 1852) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Orthoptera/Stenopelmatidae/Ammopelmatus

At a glance

Occurrence records39

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens0

eDNA detections29

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Ammopelmatus fuscus's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility39 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI29 eDNA detections↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF39 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries29 detections

01Narrative

Stenopelmatus fuscus is een rechtvleugelig insect uit de familie Stenopelmatidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van deze soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1852 door Haldeman.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding29 eDNA hits

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ammopelmatus fuscus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

eDNA detections29

Countries1

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type39 records

Wild obs. + sensor37

Museum / vouchered2

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO144 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy76% within 1 km

≤100 m 25≤1 km 1≤10 km 6>10 km 2

34 georeferenced · 3 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor37

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 2 records without

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

09Environmental DNA29 detections

Where the DNA of Ammopelmatus fuscus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found29

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 29 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median12.8 °C 9.00–16.6

Seasonal swing summer↔winter23.6 °C

Max temp (day)18.7 °C 14.6–22.8

Min temp (night)7.80 °C 4.80–10.8

Precipitation43.0 mm/mo 23.5–62.4

Air humidity54.2 % 52.3–56.0

Moisture balance-26.2 mm/mo -58.7–6.40

Vapour deficit722 Pa 523–922

Wind speed2.60 m/s

Cloud cover40.3 % 38.0–42.5

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)