Amegilla pulchra

(Smith, 1854) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Apidae/Amegilla

At a glance

Occurrence records853

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens58

eDNA detections79

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Amegilla pulchra's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility853 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI79 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics58 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF853 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries79 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD58 specimens

01Narrative

Amegilla shafferyella es una especie de abeja del género Amegilla, familia Apidae.Amegilla TSN 634005 Sistema Integrado de Información Taxonómica. Consultado el 2 de mayo de 2021.Amegilla Catalogue of Life. Consultado el 2 de mayo de 2021. Fue descrita científicamente por Rayment en 1947.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding58 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amegilla pulchra has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens58

BINs7

Marker genes2

eDNA detections79

Countries2

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus49 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 91% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 59 variable positions, in barcode order

22Gvariable

28Gvariable

31Tvariable

34Gmostly conserved

40Avariable

76Gvariable

88Gvariable

94Avariable

124Avariable

127Avariable

133Avariable

139Cvariable

181Gmostly conserved

190Avariable

196Gvariable

202Avariable

208Avariable

211Gvariable

212Cvariable

223Gvariable

235Tmostly conserved

238Gvariable

241Avariable

271Tvariable

280Gmostly conserved

283Gvariable

286Avariable

292Gvariable

316Tvariable

322Gvariable

337Avariable

340Tvariable

349Amostly conserved

373Avariable

377Tvariable

391Avariable

409Gvariable

415Avariable

416Avariable

454Tvariable

490Tvariable

531Tmostly conserved

532Amostly conserved

547Tvariable

550Amostly conserved

562Avariable

565Tvariable

568Tvariable

598Tvariable

616Cvariable

619Tvariable

622Avariable

625Cvariable

628Avariable

631Tmostly conserved

634Tvariable

637Cvariable

640Tvariable

655Avariable

TATAAATTATTTTTTGTTTGCGATATGGTCTGGGATAGTAGGATCTTCAATAAGTATAATTATTCGTATGGAATTGAGAGTTCCTGGGGC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)4.7%

Haplotypes5

BINs7

Most divergent pair8.4%

Oceania

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Amegilla murrayensissame genus7.0%Amegilla thorogoodisame genus7.4%Amegilla walkerisame genus7.5%Amegilla assertasame genus7.9%Amegilla paeninsulaesame genus9.3%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-3P★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type853 records

Wild obs. + sensor87

Museum / vouchered584

Other182

Origin

Native1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO1 056 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy82% within 1 km

≤100 m 41≤1 km 13≤10 km 3>10 km 9

66 georeferenced · 21 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor87

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy46% within 1 km

≤100 m 23≤1 km 33≤10 km 55>10 km 10

121 georeferenced · 463 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence584

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions4 of 10 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Natick, US	163
Sydney, AU	115
Australian National Fish Collectionlocation not on record	115
Museums Victorialocation not on record	100
DOI/NPS, Salem Maritime National Historic Sitelocation not on record	23
Wuzhou, CN	23
MZLUlocation not on record	14
Cambridge, US	10
Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallerylocation not on record	4
University of Alabamalocation not on record	4

10 institutions · 571 of 584 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA79 detections

Where the DNA of Amegilla pulchra was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found79

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 79 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

UrbanSuburbanopen forest

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median21.9 °C 21.9–26.6

Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.4 °C

Max temp (day)28.5 °C 24.4–29.7

Min temp (night)15.0 °C 15.0–22.8

Precipitation15.6 mm/mo 15.6–186

Air humidity43.4 % 43.4–62.2

Moisture balance-143 mm/mo -143–67.9

Vapour deficit1,624 Pa 1,122–1,624

Wind speed4.00 m/s 2.70–4.00

Cloud cover18.1 % 18.1–51.5

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 78 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)