A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ambrosiodmus minor has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens4
BINs2
Marker genes1
eDNA detections3
Countries1
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P672 bp consensus4 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 85% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Diversity (π)7.8%
Haplotypes1
BINs2
Where individuals differ — all 100 variable positions, in barcode order
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type29 records
Wild obs. + sensor29
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO40 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy92% within 1 km
≤100 m 21≤1 km 3>10 km 2
26 georeferenced · 3 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor29
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Ambrosiodmus minor was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
1. Forest & Woodland | 1.5. Subtropical/Trop…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median23.0 °C 23.0–23.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter4.20 °C
Max temp (day)27.7 °C
Min temp (night)18.2 °C
Precipitation121 mm/mo
Air humidity61.0 %
Moisture balance-30.8 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,090 Pa
Wind speed1.70 m/s
Cloud cover16.4 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
