Ambadra rafflesi

(Moore, 1859) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Lepidoptera/Notodontidae/Ambadra

At a glance

Occurrence records6

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens5

eDNA detections5

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Ambadra rafflesi's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility6 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI5 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF6 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries5 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD5 specimens

01Narrative

Ambadra rafflesi is een vlinder uit de familie van de tandvlinders (Notodontidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1859 door Moore.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding5 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ambadra rafflesi has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens5

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections5

Countries1

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus5 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 100% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)0.00%

Haplotypes1

BIN1

AACTTTATATTTTATCTTTGGAATTTGAGCAGGAATAGTAGGAACTTCTCTTAGTTTATTAATTCGAGCTGAATTAGGAAATCCAGGTTC …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Ambadra surigasame genus5.9%Sumeria dipotamicasame family7.6%Ercheia dubiasame order8.1%Turuptiana obliquasame order8.1%Gangarides flavescenssame family8.1%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type6 records

Wild obs. + sensor5

Museum / vouchered1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO8 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 5 records without

Open the mapobservation + sensor5

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km

≤10 km 1

1 georeferenced

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Institution	Specimens
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record	1

1 institutions · 1 of 1 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA5 detections

Where the DNA of Ambadra rafflesi was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found5

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 5 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median25.2 °C 24.6–25.4

Seasonal swing summer↔winter1.20 °C

Max temp (day)28.7 °C 27.8–28.9

Min temp (night)21.1 °C 20.7–21.4

Precipitation268 mm/mo 188–339

Air humidity67.1 % 65.5–67.7

Moisture balance141 mm/mo 56.4–180

Vapour deficit1,039 Pa 1,022–1,102

Wind speed1.20 m/s 1.10–1.30

Cloud cover39.0 % 29.0–66.1

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)