Amaurobioides litoralis

Hickman, 1949 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Arachnida/Araneae/Anyphaenidae/Amaurobioides

At a glance

Occurrence records24

Data sources7

Biological traits5

DNA specimens2

eDNA detections2

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Amaurobioides litoralis's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility24 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics2 specimens↗

World Spider Trait DBMasaryk University5 traits · 1 refs↗

World Spider CatalogNaturhist. Museum Bernworld catalog↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources5 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF24 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD2 specimens

01Narrative

Amaurobioides litoralis is een spinnensoort in de taxonomische indeling van de buisspinnen (Anyphaenidae). Het dier behoort tot het geslacht Amaurobioides. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort werd voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1949 door Vernon Victor Hickman.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesWolff et al. 2019

Morphometry1

Body mass0.08 mm

Predation2

Hunting guildother hunters

Web buildingno

Ecology1

Circadian activitynocturnal

Morphology1

Cribellumabsent

05DNA & barcoding2 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amaurobioides litoralis has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens2

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections2

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type24 records

Wild obs. + sensor3

Museum / vouchered21

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO36 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 3

3 georeferenced

Open the mapobservation + sensor3

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 4≤1 km 2

6 georeferenced · 15 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence21

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 3 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Sydney, AU	14
Buenos Aires, AR	4
Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallerylocation not on record	2

3 institutions · 20 of 21 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Amaurobioides litoralis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

Sea shore, rock crevices

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median14.2 °C 14.2–14.2

Seasonal swing summer↔winter5.80 °C

Max temp (day)15.9 °C

Min temp (night)12.8 °C

Precipitation55.4 mm/mo

Air humidity61.8 %

Moisture balance-50.5 mm/mo

Vapour deficit617 Pa

Wind speed3.70 m/s

Cloud cover36.0 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)