De grote glimmer is een keversoort uit de familie van de loopkevers (Carabidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort werd in 1850 gepubliceerd door Maximilien de Chaudoir.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amara majuscula has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens18
BINs1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections19
Countries4
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus17 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 99% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 5 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.30%
Haplotypes3
BIN1
Most divergent pair0.61%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type454 records
Wild obs. + sensor172
Museum / vouchered282
Origin
Native3
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 144 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy83% within 1 km
≤100 m 77≤1 km 55≤10 km 27
159 georeferenced · 13 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor172
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy75% within 1 km
≤100 m 93≤1 km 81≤10 km 52>10 km 6
232 georeferenced · 50 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence282
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions9 of 29 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
61
FEBlocation not on record
41
Tartu, EE
21
Jyväskylä, FI
21
Kushiro City Museumlocation not on record
17
ZSMlocation not on record
9
Zoological Museum of the University of Chittagong, Bangladeshlocation not on record
9
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
8
Copenhagen, DK
7
TMPMlocation not on record
6
Helsinki, FI
6
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
5
ZMAAlocation not on record
4
Veterinary Laboratory Agencylocation not on record
4
Montpellier, FR
4
Kuopio, FI
4
Yamaguchi-shi, JP
3
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
3
Geneva, CH
2
NMOKlocation not on record
1
MZLUlocation not on record
1
NHMOlocation not on record
1
University of Tokyo, Department of Zoologylocation not on record
1
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
1
Metsähallituslocation not on record
1
BioFokuslocation not on record
1
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record
1
Nijmegen, NL
1
Department of Microbiology, Prince of Songkla Universitylocation not on record
1
29 institutions · 245 of 282 vouchered records shown · 37 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA19 detections
Where the DNA of Amara majuscula was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found19
Studies independent surveys2
Countries4
Verifiable raw sequence linked1
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 19 detections have coordinates
Open the map4 countries0
140Siedlung
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median18.1 °C 16.7–18.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.2 °C
Max temp (day)22.2 °C 18.6–22.6
Min temp (night)13.8 °C 13.4–15.1
Precipitation84.1 mm/mo 60.7–92.4
Air humidity58.5 % 58.1–61.0
Moisture balance-40.9 mm/mo -74.1–-24.2
Vapour deficit874 Pa 737–880
Wind speed3.70 m/s 3.30–4.40
Cloud cover35.2 % 32.4–44.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 19 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
