Amanita rubescens, l'Amanite rougissante ou l'Amanite vineuse, familièrement la Golmotte, est une espèce de champignons basidiomycètes du genre Amanita dans la famille des Amanitaceae. Espèce très commune poussant aussi bien sous feuillus que sous conifères, elle est caractérisée par sa chair rougissante dans les blessures, son anneau strié et sa base bulbeuse. Une fois cuite, c'est un comestible réputé, elle est toxique crue.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Amanita rubescens across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Documented compounds2 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
Arsenous acid
present
LOTUS
Dimethylarsinic Acid
present
LOTUS
05DNA & barcoding38 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amanita rubescens has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens38
Marker genes4
eDNA detections2 505
Countries30
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P★ITS★ITS1★ITS2
animal barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT
The complete instruction manualAmanita rubescens carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈34 096 625 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
THIS GENOME Amanita rubescens0.03 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
Completeness92.5% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type77 101 records
Wild obs. + sensor75 138
Museum / vouchered1 837
Cultivated / captive5
Other121
Origin
Introduced2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO107 380 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy45% within 1 km
≤100 m 16 889≤1 km 11 450≤10 km 33 548>10 km 912
62 799 georeferenced · 12 339 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor75 138
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy45% within 1 km
≤100 m 87≤1 km 231≤10 km 316>10 km 73
707 georeferenced · 1 130 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 837
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 5 records without
Open the mapnot free-living5
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions54 of 96 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Bronx, US
170
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
118
TENN-Flocation not on record
96
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
87
Joensuu, FI
70
Kyiv, UA
66
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
52
Helsinki, FI
45
San Sebastián, ES
39
Durham, US
38
Vitoria, ES
37
Uppsala, SE
33
Philadelphia, US
30
Ann Arbor, US
29
FLASlocation not on record
26
BDBClocation not on record
26
Chapel Hill, US
24
Copenhagen, DK
22
MeiseBGlocation not on record
21
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
21
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
20
Champaign, US
18
Osaka, JP
18
Karlsruhe, DE
16
Brisbane, AU
16
Kew, GB
16
Chiba, JP
16
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
15
Córdoba, ES
14
ILLSlocation not on record
13
Toronto, CA
12
Blacksburg, US
12
Kuopio, FI
12
GJOlocation not on record
12
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
11
Bando, JP
11
St. Paul, US
9
WU-MYClocation not on record
9
Oulu, FI
8
Odawara, JP
7
TUR-Alocation not on record
7
V. N. Karazin National Universitylocation not on record
6
Vancouver, CA
6
Salzburg, AT
6
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
6
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
6
LDlocation not on record
6
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
5
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
5
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
5
Göteborg, SE
5
Warsaw, PL
5
Mérida, ES
5
Tomioka, JP
4
Jyväskylä, FI
4
CA
4
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
4
Denver, US
4
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
4
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
3
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
3
Auckland, NZ
3
Staten Island, US
3
Tartu, EE
3
Universidade Federale do Rio Grande do Sullocation not on record
3
BRNUlocation not on record
2
Tampa, US
2
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
2
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
2
Laramie, US
2
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
2
Baton Rouge, US
2
Lincoln, US
2
Burlington, US
1
Asheville, US
1
Cincinnati, US
1
Clemson, US
1
DPIlocation not on record
1
Yerevan State Universitylocation not on record
1
IPA/SPlocation not on record
1
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
1
Schenectady, US
1
Adelaide, AU
1
Pullman, US
1
Parkville, AU
1
Universidad Austral de Chilelocation not on record
1
Royal Ontario Museum, TRTC Fungariumlocation not on record
1
Zürich, CH
1
KNAMlocation not on record
1
Grupo Actinomicetales Merida Facultad de Medicinalocation not on record
1
Personal Herbarium of David Wasilewskilocation not on record
1
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
1
PHlocation not on record
1
Research Collection of Joanne Schwartzlocation not on record
1
Oskarshamn, SE
1
Madrid, ES
1
96 institutions · 1 469 of 1 837 vouchered records shown · 363 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA2 505 detections
Where the DNA of Amanita rubescens was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2 505
Studies independent surveys7
Countries30
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 505 detections have coordinates
Open the map30 countries0
kalkfuruskogMixed forest with a calcareous Tilia-Corylu…NeotropicPalearcticNearcticRich deciduous forest on marine deposits, do…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median16.5 °C 7.60–27.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.1 °C
Max temp (day)19.8 °C 10.6–32.8
Min temp (night)12.6 °C 4.10–23.7
Precipitation79.7 mm/mo 56.6–139
Air humidity61.5 % 59.5–66.1
Moisture balance-22.1 mm/mo -48.4–32.2
Vapour deficit727 Pa 367–1,401
Wind speed3.10 m/s 1.80–4.70
Cloud cover38.3 % 24.6–59.2
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 350 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility77 101 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 505 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics38 specimens↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗