Amanita flavoconia, commonly known as yellow patches, yellow wart, orange amanita, yellow-dust amanita or the American yellow dust amanita, is a species of mushroom in the family Amanitaceae. It has an orangish-yellow cap with yellowish-orange patches or warts, a yellowish-orange annulus, and a white to orange stem. Common and widespread throughout eastern North America, Amanita flavoconia grows on the ground in broad-leaved and mixed forests, especially in mycorrhizal association with hemlock.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Amanita flavoconia across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Documented compounds6 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
Arsenic Acid
present
LOTUS
Arsenous acid
present
LOTUS
Carboxymethyl(trimethyl)arsanium
present
LOTUS
Dimethylarsinic Acid
present
LOTUS
Methylarsonic acid
present
LOTUS
Tetramethylarsonium
present
LOTUS
05DNA & barcoding28 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amanita flavoconia has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens28
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections207
Countries4
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Amanita flavoconia var. sinapicolor voucher F:C0230622F (2850) 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P★ITS10★ITS1
animal barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type6 630 records
Wild obs. + sensor5 677
Museum / vouchered953
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO18 452 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy74% within 1 km
≤100 m 2 508≤1 km 933≤10 km 733>10 km 455
4 629 georeferenced · 1 048 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor5 677
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy46% within 1 km
≤100 m 116≤1 km 87≤10 km 205>10 km 32
440 georeferenced · 513 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence953
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions29 of 50 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Durango, MX
114
Bronx, US
100
TENN-Flocation not on record
94
Zapopan, MX
93
Chicago, US
89
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
52
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
51
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
35
Ann Arbor, US
34
FLASlocation not on record
29
Toronto, CA
24
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
23
WTUlocation not on record
22
Blacksburg, US
21
Durham, US
17
Champaign, US
12
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
11
Mexico City, MX
11
St. Paul, US
11
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
10
ILLSlocation not on record
10
Asheville, US
7
Chapel Hill, US
7
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Biologialocation not on record
4
CA
3
Ciudad de México, MX
3
Tampa, US
3
Royal Ontario Museum, TRTC Fungariumlocation not on record
3
Mexico City, MX
3
Clemson, US
2
Philadelphia, US
2
Lincoln, US
2
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
2
Baton Rouge, US
2
Universidad de los Andes (UNIANDES)location not on record
2
Carnegie Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
2
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
2
US
1
Cincinnati, US
1
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
1
Laramie, US
1
Valdosta State University Herbarium (VSC)location not on record
1
Görlitz, DE
1
University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record
1
Helsinki, FI
1
Logan, US
1
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
1
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
1
Copenhagen, DK
1
Denver, US
1
50 institutions · 925 of 953 vouchered records shown · 27 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA207 detections
Where the DNA of Amanita flavoconia was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found207
Studies independent surveys2
Countries3
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 207 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
mossy soilUnder HemlockHardwood forested area
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median3.80 °C 3.20–8.20
Seasonal swing summer↔winter25.3 °C
Max temp (day)7.20 °C 6.70–13.2
Min temp (night)0.9 °C 0.4–4.30
Precipitation142 mm/mo 99.2–158
Air humidity62.8 % 62.2–64.0
Moisture balance116 mm/mo 56.2–131
Vapour deficit302 Pa 277–451
Wind speed2.80 m/s 2.80–3.40
Cloud cover62.6 % 49.4–62.6
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 89 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.