Amanita ceciliae, commonly called snakeskin grisette, strangulated amanita, and the Cecilia's ringless amanita, is a basidiomycete fungus in the genus Amanita. First described in 1854 by Miles Joseph Berkeley and Christopher Edmund Broome, it was given its current name by Cornelis Bas in 1984. It is characterized by bearing a large fruit body with a brown cap 5 – across. The cap has charcoal-grey patches, which are easily removable. The stipe is 7 – long, white in colour, and there is no ring on it. It is slightly tapered to the top, and has irregular cottony bands girdling the base. The universal veil is grey. Spores are white, spherical in shape, non-amyloid, and measure 10.2–11.7 micrometres. The mushrooms are considered edible, but field guides typically advise caution in selecting them for consumption, due to risks of confusion with similar toxic species. A. ceciliae is found in woods throughout Europe and North America, where it fruits during summer and autumn.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amanita ceciliae has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens5
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections7
Countries4
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type4 513 records
Wild obs. + sensor4 001
Museum / vouchered494
Cultivated / captive2
Other16
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO8 656 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy50% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 219≤1 km 588≤10 km 1 738>10 km 104
3 649 georeferenced · 352 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4 001
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy69% within 1 km
≤100 m 12≤1 km 112≤10 km 50>10 km 7
181 georeferenced · 313 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence494
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 2 records without
Open the mapnot free-living2
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions34 of 61 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
29
Osaka, JP
20
Chicago, US
20
Copenhagen, DK
16
Córdoba, ES
14
WU-MYClocation not on record
14
Durango, MX
12
LDlocation not on record
10
Bando, JP
10
Kew, GB
10
Bronx, US
9
Karlsruhe, DE
9
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
7
GJOlocation not on record
7
Durham, US
6
Vitoria, ES
6
Vancouver, CA
6
Denver, US
5
MAlocation not on record
5
Chiba, JP
5
Tilburg, NL
5
WTUlocation not on record
5
Uppsala, SE
4
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
4
Champaign, US
4
Philadelphia, US
4
San Sebastián, ES
4
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
4
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
3
Olocation not on record
3
Tomioka, JP
3
Bardejov, SK
3
Salzburg, AT
3
BDBClocation not on record
3
Zürich, CH
3
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
2
St. Paul, US
2
CA
2
ILLSlocation not on record
2
TENN-Flocation not on record
2
TROMlocation not on record
2
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
2
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
1
FLASlocation not on record
1
Toronto, CA
1
Centro de Estudios Superiores del Estado de Sonoralocation not on record
1
Mérida, ES
1
Joensuu, FI
1
BRNUlocation not on record
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Kyiv, UA
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
1
Gijón, ES
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
Blacksburg, US
1
Grupo Actinomicetales Merida Facultad de Medicinalocation not on record
1
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
1
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
1
Helsinki, FI
1
Slovenian Forestry Institutelocation not on record
1
61 institutions · 308 of 494 vouchered records shown · 186 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA7 detections
Where the DNA of Amanita ceciliae was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found7
Studies independent surveys2
Countries3
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 7 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
IndomalayanPalearctic
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median12.5 °C 5.00–21.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.7 °C
Max temp (day)14.9 °C 9.40–24.5
Min temp (night)9.90 °C 0.1–17.9
Precipitation107 mm/mo 81.1–154
Air humidity61.4 % 61.2–65.5
Moisture balance51.5 mm/mo 21.6–52.4
Vapour deficit556 Pa 407–906
Wind speed2.20 m/s 1.90–3.00
Cloud cover44.3 % 43.3–63.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.