A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amanita battarrae has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens7
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections130
Countries5
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type4 380 records
Wild obs. + sensor3 988
Museum / vouchered358
Other34
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO9 876 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy57% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 073≤1 km 738≤10 km 1 339>10 km 19
3 169 georeferenced · 819 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 988
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy72% within 1 km
≤100 m 82≤1 km 87≤10 km 58>10 km 8
235 georeferenced · 123 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence358
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions23 of 43 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
31
Helsinki, FI
23
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
22
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
17
BDBClocation not on record
16
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
12
TUR-Alocation not on record
9
GJOlocation not on record
9
Salzburg, AT
7
Copenhagen, DK
7
Trondheim, NO
7
Philadelphia, US
7
TROMlocation not on record
7
Staten Island, US
6
Görlitz, DE
6
WU-MYClocation not on record
6
Uppsala, SE
6
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
5
CJBGlocation not on record
5
Turku, FI
5
Karlsruhe, DE
5
Kew, GB
5
Joensuu, FI
4
MAlocation not on record
4
Bardejov, SK
4
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
4
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
4
nsnflocation not on record
4
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
3
2
Toronto, CA
2
Tilburg, NL
2
Jyväskylä, FI
2
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
2
Slovenian Forestry Institutelocation not on record
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
Mlocation not on record
2
Stockholm, SE
1
Chicago, US
1
LDlocation not on record
1
Tartu, EE
1
Gijón, ES
1
Oulu, FI
1
43 institutions · 272 of 358 vouchered records shown · 86 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA130 detections
Where the DNA of Amanita battarrae was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found130
Studies independent surveys3
Countries3
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median11.1 °C 5.30–16.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.8 °C
Max temp (day)15.7 °C 8.60–19.2
Min temp (night)7.60 °C 0.6–12.6
Precipitation76.0 mm/mo 32.7–87.9
Air humidity59.6 % 58.8–66.8
Moisture balance-26.8 mm/mo -40.0–33.9
Vapour deficit520 Pa 316–735
Wind speed3.00 m/s 2.50–4.50
Cloud cover43.3 % 37.9–60.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 125 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.