Altica rosae — The Life Data

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Chrysomelidae/Altica

At a glance

Occurrence records1

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens5

eDNA detections1

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Altica rosae's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation1 languages↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Tree of SexTree of Sex Consortiumgenome & karyotype↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF1 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD5 specimens

Genome at a glanceTreeOfSex2n = 24

01Narrative

Altica rosae is a species of flea beetle in the family Chrysomelidae. It is found in North America.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding5 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Altica rosae has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens5

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P

animal barcode

06Genome at a glanceTreeOfSex

The complete instruction manual Altica rosae carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.

Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged

2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.

Chromosomes2n = 24 n = 12

Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references

2n 241×TreeOfSex · invert

TreeOfSex · invert — Petitpierre E, Segarra C, Yadav JS, Virkki N (1988) Chromosome number and meioformulae of Chrysomelidae. In: Jolivet P, Petitpierre E, Hsiao TH, editors. Biology of Chrysomelidae. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ↗

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type1 records

Wild obs. + sensor1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO4 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1

1 georeferenced

Open the mapobservation + sensor1

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Altica rosae was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.