Compounds documented for Alstonia macrophylla across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Alstonia macrophylla has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens12
Marker genes4
eDNA detections9
Countries3
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL★trnL-F★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualAlstonia macrophylla carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size716 385 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Alstonia macrophylla0.72 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy95% within 1 km
≤100 m 304≤1 km 23≤10 km 5>10 km 14
346 georeferenced · 300 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor646
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy25% within 1 km
≤100 m 4≤1 km 9≤10 km 33>10 km 6
52 georeferenced · 367 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence419
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions26 of 49 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Brisbane, AU
25
Honolulu, US
19
Kew, GB
13
Fort Worth, US
11
Saint Louis, US
11
Smithfield, AU
10
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
7
Miami, US
6
Canberra, AU
6
Tampa, US
6
BISHlocation not on record
5
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
4
Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
4
Cambridge University Herbariumlocation not on record
4
Istituto Agrario Castelnuovolocation not on record
3
Auckland, NZ
3
SCAUlocation not on record
2
Durban, ZA
2
Guilin, CN
2
Seychelles National Herbariumlocation not on record
2
St. Paul, US
2
Burlington, US
2
Stockholm, SE
2
Beijing, CN
2
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record
1
MSB-3349location not on record
1
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
1
UNICAMPlocation not on record
1
JBRJlocation not on record
1
Pomona Collegelocation not on record
1
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chilelocation not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
Xiamen, CN
1
Pretoria, ZA
1
Kunming, CN
1
AUAlocation not on record
1
Brasília, BR
1
Bronx, US
1
Seropédica, BR
1
Gujarat Biodiversity Gene Banklocation not on record
1
EL PASO, US
1
Cenargenlocation not on record
1
UFRRJlocation not on record
1
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
1
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
1
Cambridge, US
1
Philadelphia, US
1
49 institutions · 178 of 419 vouchered records shown · 240 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA9 detections
Where the DNA of Alstonia macrophylla was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found9
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 9 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median23.0 °C 22.3–23.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter7.80 °C
Max temp (day)28.3 °C 27.4–29.2
Min temp (night)17.9 °C 15.4–20.5
Precipitation156 mm/mo 31.9–281
Air humidity57.0 % 46.8–67.2
Moisture balance33.8 mm/mo -87.4–155
Vapour deficit1,194 Pa 960–1,428
Wind speed2.30 m/s 2.10–2.60
Cloud cover33.8 % 19.5–48.1
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.