Aloysia virgata é uma espécie botânica pertencente à família Verbenaceae. No Brasil é popularmente chamada lixeira, lixinha, lixa branca, lixa ou erva-cheirosa. É nativa da região norte da Argentina e do sul do Brasil.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Aloysia virgata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections10
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK4★rbcL3★ITS3★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualAloysia virgata carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈595 623 838 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Aloysia virgata0.60 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelScaffold
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 046 records
Wild obs. + sensor111
Museum / vouchered863
Other72
Origin
Native376
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 356 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy92% within 1 km
≤100 m 64≤1 km 16≤10 km 6>10 km 1
87 georeferenced · 24 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor111
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy92% within 1 km
≤100 m 11≤10 km 1
12 georeferenced · 851 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence863
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions33 of 94 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
86
Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
35
UTFPR-CPlocation not on record
34
Kew, GB
34
Istituto Agrario Castelnuovolocation not on record
33
Blumenau, BR
32
Campo Mourão, BR
29
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
28
UnBlocation not on record
27
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Foralocation not on record
26
Feira de Santana, BR
26
Saint Louis, US
26
Cascavel, BR
24
UNICAMPlocation not on record
23
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
20
UFMSlocation not on record
20
Paleontological Collectionlocation not on record
16
Uberlândia, BR
16
Londrina, BR
15
UNESP-IBILCElocation not on record
15
JBRJlocation not on record
14
Cenargenlocation not on record
13
Foz do Iguaçu, BR
13
Centro de Pesquisas Agropecuarias do Tropico Umidolocation not on record
12
Brasília, BR
12
UFBAlocation not on record
11
UTFPR-DVlocation not on record
11
UEMlocation not on record
11
Bronx, US
10
Mérida, MX
10
Chaguaramas, TT
9
Brasília, BR
9
San Isidro, AR
8
UNESP, Campus São José Rio Prêtolocation not on record
8
CEPLAClocation not on record
7
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paranálocation not on record
5
Stockholm, SE
5
Corrientes, AR
5
UFSCarlocation not on record
4
Centro de Estudios y Colecciones Biológicas para la Conservaciónlocation not on record
4
Universidade Federale do Rio Grande do Sullocation not on record
4
Universidade de São Paulolocation not on record
4
UFSClocation not on record
4
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarinalocation not on record
4
Santa Cruz de la Sierra, BO
3
La Paz, BO
3
UNIVILLElocation not on record
3
Masindi, UG
3
MAlocation not on record
3
Antiguo Cuscatlán, SV
3
UNEMATlocation not on record
3
ESALQlocation not on record
3
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
3
UNESP-ISlocation not on record
3
UNESP-RClocation not on record
2
Universidad Nacional de Asunciónlocation not on record
2
UFPRlocation not on record
2
FUVATESlocation not on record
2
Salvador, BR
2
UNESP-FCAlocation not on record
2
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
2
Universidade Federal do Ceara, Departamento de Biologialocation not on record
2
Berlin, DE
2
UNESClocation not on record
2
IPA/SPlocation not on record
2
Ilhéus, BR
2
Edinburgh, GB
2
Universidade da Região de Joinville - Univillelocation not on record
2
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus do Pantanallocation not on record
2
Bogotá, D.C., CO
2
Universidad Nacional de Misiones- CONICETlocation not on record
1
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)location not on record
1
Criciúma, BR
1
Jataí / Setor Industrial, BR
1
LDlocation not on record
1
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
1
UFVJMlocation not on record
1
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paranálocation not on record
1
Universidade Federal do Maranhãolocation not on record
1
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
1
Austin, US
1
UDESC-CAVlocation not on record
1
UFSJlocation not on record
1
Córdoba, AR
1
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chilelocation not on record
1
UFPElocation not on record
1
URCAlocation not on record
1
HUENFlocation not on record
1
Paris, FR
1
UNIVASFlocation not on record
1
Cruz das Almas, BR
1
Ural Federal University "B. N. Yeltsin"location not on record
1
UFRPElocation not on record
1
UESBlocation not on record
1
94 institutions · 848 of 863 vouchered records shown · 15 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA10 detections
Where the DNA of Aloysia virgata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found10
Studies independent surveys2
Countries1
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 10 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median21.1 °C 19.5–21.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter12.3 °C
Max temp (day)25.9 °C 24.1–25.9
Min temp (night)16.2 °C 15.1–16.2
Precipitation166 mm/mo 151–167
Air humidity58.9 % 58.7–59.9
Moisture balance22.7 mm/mo 9.90–34.5
Vapour deficit1,019 Pa 915–1,021
Wind speed3.50 m/s 3.40–4.70
Cloud cover37.2 % 36.5–37.2
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 7 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.