Aloysia gratissima est une plante ligneuse de la famille des Verbenaceae. Ce buisson de 1 à 3 mètres de hauteur tolère la sécheresse et les sols mal drainés. On le retrouve du sud des États-Unis jusqu’en Uruguay et en Argentine.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Habitat GIFTÁrea Antrópica, Campo de Altitude, Campo Limpo, Floresta Ciliar ou Galeria
Mycorrhiza type0.000000274
Woodinesswoody
Physiology & chemistry2
Nitrogen fixingnon_nitrogen_fixer
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
03Chemical composition28 compounds
Compounds documented for Aloysia gratissima across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Aloysia gratissima has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens1
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences4
eDNA detections2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL1★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualAloysia gratissima carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 36 n = 18
Ploidypolyploid inferred
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
n 181×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Coleman, J. R. 1982. Chromosome numbers of Angiosperms collected in the state of São Paulo. Revista Brasil Genet. 5: 533–549.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy89% within 1 km
≤100 m 2 852≤1 km 560≤10 km 223>10 km 203
3 838 georeferenced · 986 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4 824
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy59% within 1 km
≤100 m 139≤1 km 25≤10 km 86>10 km 28
278 georeferenced · 564 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence842
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions60 of 121 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Durango, MX
78
Austin, US
69
Fort Worth, US
63
UFRRJlocation not on record
34
Austin, US
28
Kew, GB
26
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Foralocation not on record
24
ASUlocation not on record
22
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
22
EL PASO, US
20
Guasave, MX
19
Riverside, US
17
Mexico City, MX
17
Córdoba, AR
17
Saint Louis, US
16
Wuzhou, CN
15
Corrientes, AR
15
Hermosillo, MX
14
Texas Lutheran Universitylocation not on record
14
San Angelo, US
11
San Isidro, AR
11
BAYLUlocation not on record
10
Juriquilla, MX
10
Phoenix, US
9
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
9
Blumenau, BR
9
Bronx, US
8
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
6
Universidade Federale do Rio Grande do Sullocation not on record
6
Castelar, AR
6
Zacatecas, MX
6
JBRJlocation not on record
6
San Diego, US
6
Chapingo, MX
6
USP-IBlocation not on record
6
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record
6
Giardini Botanici Hanburylocation not on record
5
Istituto Agrario Castelnuovolocation not on record
5
Feira de Santana, BR
5
Davis, US
5
Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
5
Ilhéus, BR
4
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chilelocation not on record
4
FUVATESlocation not on record
4
Sucre, BO
4
UFSClocation not on record
4
Cenargenlocation not on record
4
Seropédica, BR
4
Lake Charles, US
4
UNESClocation not on record
4
Santa Cruz de la Sierra, BO
3
PUC-RSlocation not on record
3
Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahualocation not on record
3
UEPAlocation not on record
3
UnBlocation not on record
3
La Paz, BO
3
Universidad Nacional de Asunciónlocation not on record
3
Claremont, US
3
Brasília, BR
3
UFVJMlocation not on record
3
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarinalocation not on record
3
UNICAMPlocation not on record
3
WTUlocation not on record
3
Criciúma, BR
3
Cascavel, BR
2
Foz do Iguaçu, BR
2
UNESP-RClocation not on record
2
UTFPR-CPlocation not on record
2
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
2
Bloomington, US
2
IAPlocation not on record
2
Pretoria, ZA
2
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
2
MAlocation not on record
2
Brasília, BR
2
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
2
Burlington, US
2
Paleontological Collectionlocation not on record
2
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicachlocation not on record
1
UESBlocation not on record
1
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paranálocation not on record
1
Flagstaff, US
1
IANIGLAlocation not on record
1
Institut fur Allgemeine Mikrobiologielocation not on record
1
Federal University of Espírito Santolocation not on record
1
Dekalb, US
1
UNIVASFlocation not on record
1
UFPRlocation not on record
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
Salvador, BR
1
USONlocation not on record
1
Wlocation not on record
1
Stephenville, US
1
Moscow, US
1
La Paz, MX
1
Facultad de Agronomía - Universidad de la Repúblicalocation not on record
1
València, ES
1
MEXUlocation not on record
1
Santa Maria, BR
1
Madison, US
1
South Kensington, GB
1
UFABClocation not on record
1
UNESP-IBILCElocation not on record
1
Henry Brockhouse Collectionlocation not on record
1
UFMGlocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
Universidade Federal do Ceara, Departamento de Biologialocation not on record
1
Tampa, US
1
Campo Mourão, BR
1
Santarém, BR
1
GAlocation not on record
1
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santolocation not on record
1
INMAlocation not on record
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
UFSMlocation not on record
1
CASlocation not on record
1
UTPLlocation not on record
1
Pelotas, BR
1
Cruz das Almas, BR
1
Provo, US
1
UFBAlocation not on record
1
121 institutions · 835 of 842 vouchered records shown · 7 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Aloysia gratissima was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.