Alopias vulpinus
(Bonnaterre, 1788) · speciesAt a glance
Sources10 archives
Databases and archives Alopias vulpinus's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation18 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility3 669 records↗
OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System1 729 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI625 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics62 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
Paleobiology DatabasePBDB consortiumfossil record↗
WikidataWikimedia Foundationstructured facts↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
The common thresher (Alopias vulpinus), also known as Atlantic thresher, is the largest species of thresher shark, family Alopiidae, reaching some 6 m in length. About half of its length consists of the elongated upper lobe of its caudal fin. With a streamlined body, short pointed snout, and modestly sized eyes, the common thresher resembles (and has often been confused with) the pelagic thresher (A. pelagicus). It can be distinguished from the latter species by the white of its belly extending in a band over the bases of its pectoral fins. The common thresher is distributed worldwide in tropical and temperate waters, though it prefers cooler temperatures. It can be found both close to shore and in the open ocean, from the surface to a depth of 550 m. It is seasonally migratory and spends summers at lower latitudes. The long tail of the common thresher, the source of many fanciful tales through history, is used in a whip-like fashion to deliver incapacitating blows to its prey. This species feeds mainly on small schooling forage fishes such as herrings and anchovies. It is a fast, strong swimmer that has been known to leap clear of the water, and possesses physiological adaptations that allow it to maintain an internal body temperature warmer than that of the surrounding sea water. The common thresher has an aplacental viviparous mode of reproduction, with oophagous embryos that feed on undeveloped eggs ovulated by their mother. Females typically give birth to four pups at a time, following a gestation period of nine months. Despite its size, the common thresher is minimally dangerous to humans due to its relatively small teeth and timid disposition. It is highly valued by commercial fishers for its meat, fins, hide, and liver oil; large numbers are taken by longline and gillnet fisheries throughout its range. This shark is also esteemed by recreational anglers for the exceptional fight it offers on hook-and-line. The common thresher has a low rate of reproduction and cannot withstand heavy fishing pressure for long, a case in point being the rapid collapse of the thresher shark fishery off California in the 1980s. With commercial exploitation increasing in many parts of the world, the International Union for Conservation of Nature has assessed this species as vulnerable.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology2
Life cycle & reproduction1
Habitat & environment2
Uses & economy1
Other traits3
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Alopias vulpinus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
Besides the big genome in the nucleus, cells carry a small, circular loop of DNA inside the cell's energy factories — the mitochondria. It is inherited almost only from the mother and is a leftover from ancient bacteria that moved into the cell. The mitochondrial markers above (ND*, COX, CYTB…) are read from exactly this loop. Outer ring = one strand, inner ring = the other.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The solid bar is the fossil range: the span between the oldest and the youngest fossil that palaeontologists have assigned to Alopias vulpinus. Above itBeside it, each dot is one dated fossil find — few enough to count, so they are drawn individually rather than as a graph.
How it livedPBDB
Record type5 422 records
Origin
Range
Depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions12 of 38 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| DASSHlocation not on record | 24 |
| Los Angeles, US | 23 |
| University of California San Diegolocation not on record | 21 |
| Museums Victorialocation not on record | 13 |
| Cambridge, US | 12 |
| Australian National Fish Collectionlocation not on record | 9 |
| Washington, US | 8 |
| Paris, FR | 8 |
| Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record | 7 |
| Ilvolocation not on record | 7 |
| CASlocation not on record | 7 |
| Sydney, AU | 6 |
| North Carolina Museum of Natural Scienceslocation not on record | 5 |
| South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversitylocation not on record | 4 |
| New Haven, US | 3 |
| Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Surlocation not on record | 3 |
| National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korealocation not on record | 3 |
| Ecole Nationale Superieure des Sciences de la Mer et d'Amenagement du Littoral, Algerialocation not on record | 2 |
| Moore Laboratory of Zoology, Occidental Collegelocation not on record | 2 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 2 |
| Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collectionlocation not on record | 2 |
| UWFClocation not on record | 2 |
| Oregon State Universitylocation not on record | 2 |
| Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallerylocation not on record | 2 |
| Barcelona, ES | 2 |
| Stockholm, SE | 2 |
| Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientalelocation not on record | 2 |
| Mexico City, MX | 1 |
| Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 1 |
| The Atlantic reference Centrelocation not on record | 1 |
| Nova Scotia Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Kagoshima University Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Auckland, NZ | 1 |
| Citadel Hill, GB | 1 |
| Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale della Toscanalocation not on record | 1 |
| DOI/NPS, Salem Maritime National Historic Sitelocation not on record | 1 |
| Edmonton, CA | 1 |
| UNICAMPlocation not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Alopias vulpinus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.