Aioliops novaeguineae — The Life Data

Animalia/Chordata/Perciformes/Microdesmidae/Aioliops

At a glance

Occurrence records120

Data sources7

Biological traits6

DNA specimens2

eDNA detections2

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Aioliops novaeguineae's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility106 records↗

OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System14 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics2 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources6 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF · OBIS120 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD2 specimens

01Narrative

Aioliops novaeguineae is een straalvinnige vissensoort uit de familie van torpedogrondels (Ptereleotridae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1987 door Rennis & Hoese.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesFishBase

Size & morphology1

Body length2.3 cm

Habitat & environment2

Habitat saltwateryes

Habitat zonereef-associated

Other traits3

Depth max10 m

Depth min2 m

Vulnerability10

05DNA & barcoding2 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Aioliops novaeguineae has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens2

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections2

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type120 records

Wild obs. + sensor103

Museum / vouchered17

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO164 km²

Depth

0–200 m sunlit8

200–1000 m twilight0

1–4 km midnight0

>4 km abyssal0

median 5.5 m · max 10 m · 8 records with depth

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy93% within 1 km

≤100 m 12≤1 km 1>10 km 1

14 georeferenced · 89 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor103

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy80% within 1 km

≤1 km 4>10 km 1

5 georeferenced · 12 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence17

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions3 of 5 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territorylocation not on record	4
Sydney, AU	3
Toronto, CA	1
Washington, US	1
Western Australian Museumlocation not on record	1

5 institutions · 10 of 17 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Aioliops novaeguineae was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.