Agrilus xanthonotus — The Life Data

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Buprestidae/Agrilus

At a glance

Occurrence records40

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens6

eDNA detections1

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Agrilus xanthonotus's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility40 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics6 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF40 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD6 specimens

01Narrative

Agrilus xanthonotus é uma espécie de inseto do género Agrilus, família Buprestidae, ordem Coleoptera. Foi descrita cientificamente por Waterhouse, 1889.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding6 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Agrilus xanthonotus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens6

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

18S-5P

ribosomal

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type40 records

Wild obs. + sensor12

Museum / vouchered28

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO80 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy90% within 1 km

≤100 m 6≤1 km 3≤10 km 1

10 georeferenced · 2 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor12

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy67% within 1 km

≤100 m 4≤10 km 2

6 georeferenced · 22 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence28

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions1 of 6 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record	18
Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Costa Ricalocation not on record	4
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Moreloslocation not on record	3
Instituto de Fitosanidad, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillolocation not on record	1
Mexico City, MX	1
Essig Museum of Entomologylocation not on record	1

6 institutions · 28 of 28 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Agrilus xanthonotus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.