Agrilus roscidus

Kiesenwetter, 1857 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Buprestidae/Agrilus

At a glance

Occurrence records211

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens28

eDNA detections19

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Agrilus roscidus's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility211 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI19 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics28 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF211 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 7 countries19 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD28 specimens

01Narrative

Agrilus roscidus é uma espécie de inseto do género Agrilus, família Buprestidae, ordem Coleoptera. Foi descrita cientificamente por Kiesenwetter, 1857.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding28 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Agrilus roscidus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens28

BINs3

Marker genes2

eDNA detections19

Countries10

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus18 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 92% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 55 variable positions, in barcode order

1Tmostly conserved

19Cmostly conserved

28Avariable

34Avariable

40Gmostly conserved

79Avariable

82Cmostly conserved

88Gvariable

103Cvariable

106Cmostly conserved

169Tmostly conserved

181Amostly conserved

196Gvariable

197Tmostly conserved

217Avariable

235Tvariable

253Amostly conserved

278Cvariable

280Avariable

286Amostly conserved

289Tvariable

310Avariable

316Avariable

319Avariable

331Avariable

343Cvariable

352Tvariable

364Amostly conserved

373Avariable

391Tmostly conserved

400Tvariable

406Cvariable

415Tvariable

417Tmostly conserved

418Amostly conserved

421Cmostly conserved

424Cmostly conserved

433Avariable

474Cmostly conserved

499Cvariable

500Tvariable

502Avariable

523Tmostly conserved

530Cvariable

532Amostly conserved

557Cmostly conserved

562Tvariable

565Avariable

571Tmostly conserved

613Cvariable

619Cvariable

631Avariable

637Tvariable

646Cvariable

655Avariable

TACACTCTATTTTATCTTCGGAGCCTGATCAGGAATAGTGGGAACTGCTTTAAGATTATTAATTCGAGCTGAATTAGGAAACCCTGGGGC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)3.0%

Haplotypes6

BINs3

Most divergent pair5.0%

EuropeAsia

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Agrilus kubanisame genus2.5%Chrysobothris leechisame family15.0%Selenophorus contractussame order15.5%Pterostichus agonussame order15.5%Chlaenius nigricornissame order16.0%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-3P★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type211 records

Wild obs. + sensor91

Museum / vouchered101

Other19

Origin

Native5

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO544 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy35% within 1 km

≤100 m 16≤1 km 13≤10 km 47>10 km 7

83 georeferenced · 8 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor91

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy35% within 1 km

≤100 m 2≤1 km 4≤10 km 9>10 km 2

17 georeferenced · 84 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence101

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions4 of 10 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record	47
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record	21
Bern, CH	6
Paris, FR	3
Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Scienceslocation not on record	3
Paro, BT	2
NTNU-VMlocation not on record	2
MZLUlocation not on record	2
Helsinki, FI	1
EJCBlocation not on record	1

10 institutions · 88 of 101 vouchered records shown · 7 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA19 detections

Where the DNA of Agrilus roscidus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found19

Studies independent surveys1

Countries7

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 19 detections have coordinates

Open the map7 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median19.0 °C 5.90–21.6

Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.0 °C

Max temp (day)23.5 °C 9.70–25.1

Min temp (night)12.9 °C 1.10–18.9

Precipitation43.3 mm/mo 26.0–83.0

Air humidity58.8 % 53.7–65.9

Moisture balance-85.2 mm/mo -136–28.8

Vapour deficit996 Pa 370–1,216

Wind speed2.40 m/s 1.80–3.50

Cloud cover37.2 % 29.9–43.4

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 19 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)