Agrilus crataegi — The Life Data

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Buprestidae/Agrilus

At a glance

Occurrence records192

Data sources8

Biological traits0

DNA specimens8

eDNA detections7

Sources8 archives

Databases and archives Agrilus crataegi's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility192 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI7 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics8 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF192 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries7 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD8 specimens

01Narrative

Agrilus crataegi, the hawthorn agrilus, is a species of metallic wood-boring beetle in the family Buprestidae. It is found in North America.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding8 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Agrilus crataegi has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens8

BINs1

Marker genes2

eDNA detections7

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-3PCOI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type192 records

Museum / vouchered192

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO112 km²

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 192 records without

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence192

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 4 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Chicago, US	135
University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record	29
University of Guelphlocation not on record	19
Vernal, US	5

4 institutions · 188 of 192 vouchered records shown · 3 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA7 detections

Where the DNA of Agrilus crataegi was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found7

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 7 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median18.5 °C 6.00–19.9

Seasonal swing summer↔winter30.6 °C

Max temp (day)23.6 °C 10.5–24.9

Min temp (night)13.8 °C 1.90–15.5

Precipitation79.8 mm/mo 53.3–100

Air humidity58.1 % 54.2–62.4

Moisture balance-49.9 mm/mo -71.3–-16.6

Vapour deficit915 Pa 582–956

Wind speed2.50 m/s 1.90–4.20

Cloud cover42.7 % 39.9–51.0

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 6 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.