Adenomera andreae
(Müller, 1923) · speciesAt a glance
Sources9 archives
Databases and archives Adenomera andreae's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation5 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 956 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI20 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics99 specimens↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
WikidataWikimedia Foundationstructured facts↗
Amphibian Species of the WorldAMNHamphibian catalog↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Adenomera andreae (common name: lowland tropical bullfrog) is a species of frogs in the family Leptodactylidae. It is found in the lowlands of northern South America east of the Andes (Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Suriname, and Venezuela). As currently defined, it probably represents a cryptic species complex, comprising perhaps four species.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology2
Life cycle & reproduction3
Diet & foraging1
Habitat & environment1
Other traits7
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Adenomera andreae has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Adenomera andreae carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type2 956 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions12 of 33 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Museo de Zoologia, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuadorlocation not on record | 614 |
| Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record | 394 |
| Washington, US | 273 |
| Wuzhou, CN | 210 |
| Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 180 |
| Cambridge, US | 86 |
| Los Angeles, US | 77 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 38 |
| Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ)location not on record | 35 |
| UNICAMPlocation not on record | 34 |
| PUC-RSlocation not on record | 23 |
| Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas - SINCHIlocation not on record | 20 |
| Brussels, BE | 16 |
| UFMSlocation not on record | 13 |
| INMAlocation not on record | 13 |
| RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record | 11 |
| 10 | |
| Museo de Zoología de la Universidad del Azuay (MZUA)location not on record | 10 |
| CASlocation not on record | 10 |
| Berkeley, US | 8 |
| Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record | 7 |
| South Kensington, GB | 6 |
| Fundación Jambatu - CJlocation not on record | 6 |
| Universidad de La Salle (La Salle)location not on record | 6 |
| Provo, US | 5 |
| Londrina, BR | 4 |
| Paris, FR | 4 |
| Universidad de la Amazonia (UniAmazonia)location not on record | 4 |
| Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipalocation not on record | 4 |
| Museo MZUTIlocation not on record | 3 |
| University, National Zoological Collection of Surinamelocation not on record | 3 |
| Museo de Zoología, Universidad San Francisco de Quitolocation not on record | 3 |
| University of Texas at Arlingtonlocation not on record | 2 |
Where the DNA of Adenomera andreae was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.