Adelia barbinervis, commonly known as teenek, is a species of flowering plant in the family Euphorbiaceae, that is native to southern Mexico and northern Central America. The Huastec Maya cultivated the plant as a famine food, cooking the shoots and tender leaves as greens. It is common in milpa regrowth ecosystems.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Adelia barbinervis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens6
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences5
eDNA detections4
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK3★rbcL1★rbcLa★ITS1
plant barcodefungal barcode
07Deep time~11.4 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin11.4 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 102 records
Wild obs. + sensor9
Museum / vouchered1 093
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 000 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy88% within 1 km
≤100 m 6≤1 km 1≤10 km 1
8 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor9
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy94% within 1 km
≤100 m 564≤1 km 23≤10 km 29>10 km 9
625 georeferenced · 468 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 093
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions36 of 49 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Durango, MX
379
Mexico City, MX
143
Chicago, US
110
Saint Louis, US
78
Mérida, MX
51
Austin, US
46
Mexico City, MX
29
Chapingo, MX
26
Bronx, US
24
Tapachula, MX
19
San Francisco, US
16
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
14
Ann Arbor, US
12
Edinburgh, GB
10
Madison, US
10
Juriquilla, MX
8
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
8
Mexico City, MX
7
CASlocation not on record
7
South Kensington, GB
7
San Francisco de Campeche, MX
7
Antiguo Cuscatlán, SV
7
MEXUlocation not on record
7
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
6
Austin, US
5
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
5
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
4
Kew, GB
4
Berlin, DE
4
Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabascolocation not on record
4
Mérida, MX
4
Paris, FR
3
Instituto de Ecología Aplicada, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipaslocation not on record
3
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
2
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Biologialocation not on record
2
Tampa, US
2
St. Paul, US
2
Puebla, MX
2
Autlán de Navarro, MX
2
Guasave, MX
2
Riverside, US
1
Montecillo, Texcoco, MX
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
Minister of Sustainable Development, Climate Change & Solid Waste Managementlocation not on record
1
Ciudad de México, MX
1
JBRJlocation not on record
1
San Luis Potosí, MX
1
Ciudad de México, MX
1
BMlocation not on record
1
49 institutions · 1 090 of 1 093 vouchered records shown · 3 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Adelia barbinervis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median23.2 °C 22.9–23.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter5.40 °C
Max temp (day)28.7 °C 28.3–29.0
Min temp (night)19.0 °C 18.7–19.2
Precipitation39.3 mm/mo 38.7–39.8
Air humidity60.8 % 60.6–61.0
Moisture balance-60.7 mm/mo -65.4–-56.0
Vapour deficit1,116 Pa 1,102–1,129
Wind speed1.70 m/s 1.60–1.70
Cloud cover29.3 % 25.7–32.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.