Actinote guatemalena

Bates, 1864 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae/Actinote

At a glance

Occurrence records356

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens2

eDNA detections2

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Actinote guatemalena's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility356 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics2 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF356 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD2 specimens

01Narrative

Actinote guatemalena is een vlinder uit de familie van de Nymphalidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1864 door Henry Walter Bates.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding2 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Actinote guatemalena has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens2

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections2

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type356 records

Wild obs. + sensor47

Museum / vouchered275

Other34

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO444 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy76% within 1 km

≤100 m 19≤1 km 10≤10 km 8>10 km 1

38 georeferenced · 9 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor47

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy81% within 1 km

≤100 m 53≤1 km 6≤10 km 11>10 km 3

73 georeferenced · 202 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence275

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions11 of 17 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Ciudad de México, MX	124
Mexico City, MX	58
Tapachula, MX	15
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record	14
Ciudad de México, MX	12
New Haven, US	10
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record	8
	6
Washington, US	5
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record	3
Cambridge, US	2
Chicago, US	2
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record	2
Essig Museum of Entomologylocation not on record	2
Los Angeles, US	2
San Francisco, US	1
Universidad del Valle de Guatemalalocation not on record	1

17 institutions · 267 of 275 vouchered records shown · 8 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Actinote guatemalena was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median24.2 °C 24.2–24.2

Seasonal swing summer↔winter2.20 °C

Max temp (day)28.5 °C

Min temp (night)20.7 °C

Precipitation135 mm/mo

Air humidity65.9 %

Moisture balance-6.80 mm/mo

Vapour deficit1,029 Pa

Wind speed1.60 m/s

Cloud cover13.8 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)