Acteocina harpa is een slakkensoort uit de familie van de Tornatinidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1871 door Dall.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acteocina harpa has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes1
eDNA detections3
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
28S
marker
07Deep time2.58–0 Ma
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
Fossil range2.58–0 Ma Pleistocene, Holocene
Dated fossil finds19
StatusStill living record runs to the present
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The solid bar is the fossil range: the span between the oldest and the youngest fossil that palaeontologists have assigned to Acteocina harpa. Above itBeside it, each dot is one dated fossil find — few enough to count, so they are drawn individually rather than as a graph.
fossil range (PBDB)each dot = one dated find
How it livedPBDB
Life habitsemi-infaunal
Dietcarnivore
Motilityactively mobile
Visionlimited
Compositionaragonite
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type418 records
Wild obs. + sensor30
Museum / vouchered119
Fossil262
Other7
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO312 km²
Depth
0–200 m sunlit18
200–1000 m twilight0
1–4 km midnight0
>4 km abyssal0
median 30.1 m · max 109 m · 18 records with depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy90% within 1 km
≤100 m 3≤1 km 6≤10 km 1
10 georeferenced · 20 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor30
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy30% within 1 km
≤100 m 5≤1 km 4≤10 km 18>10 km 3
30 georeferenced · 89 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence119
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions7 of 13 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
49
Cambridge, US
9
CASlocation not on record
7
Washington, US
6
Philadelphia, US
5
Edmonton, CA
5
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
4
Los Angeles, US
3
Delaware Museum of Nature and Sciencelocation not on record
3
Denver, US
1
Victoria, CA
1
Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja Californialocation not on record
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
13 institutions · 95 of 119 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Acteocina harpa was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.