The dark dagger (Acronicta tridens) is a moth of the family Noctuidae. The species was first described by Michael Denis and Ignaz Schiffermüller in 1775. It is distributed throughout Europe (from southern Fennoscandia to the Balkans and Italy), Turkey, the Near East, the European part of Russia, southern Siberia, the Ural, the Russian Far East (Primorye, southern Khabarovsk, southern Amur region and Sakhalin), the Korean Peninsula, China and Japan (Hokkaido). This species has grey forewings marked with bold black "daggers". The hindwings of the males are white, those of the females dirty grey. The wingspan is 35–43 mm. Adults of this species are extremely similar to the grey dagger (Acronicta psi). Despite the common name, the dark dagger is usually the paler of the two species and the white hindwings of the male are usually diagnostic. However, the only reliable way of distinguishing adults of the two species is by examination of the genitalia. See See Townsend et al.Martin C. Townsend, Jon Clifton and Brian Goodey (2010). British and Irish Moths: An Illustrated Guide to Selected Difficult Species. (covering the use of genitalia characters and other features) Butterfly Conservation. The larvae, however, are very different (see below). This species flies at night in June and July and is attracted to light and sometimes to sugar. The larva is black, marked with red and white stripes, without the bold yellow markings and prominent horn of the larva of the grey dagger. It feeds on a variety of plants (see list below). This species overwinters as a pupa, sometimes spending two winters in this form. The flight season refers to the British Isles. This may vary in other parts of the range.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acronicta tridens has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens33
BINs4
Marker genes1
eDNA detections3
Countries10
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus32 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 93% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 45 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)1.5%
Haplotypes6
BINs4
Most divergent pair0.61%
EuropeAsia
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type18 935 records
Wild obs. + sensor17 564
Museum / vouchered1 042
Other329
Origin
Native327
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO19 528 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy16% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 981≤1 km 578≤10 km 13 297>10 km 41
15 897 georeferenced · 1 667 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor17 564
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy36% within 1 km
≤100 m 164≤1 km 116≤10 km 462>10 km 39
781 georeferenced · 261 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 042
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions18 of 45 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
DanishLepidopterologicalSocietylocation not on record
295
Helsinki, FI
173
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
95
ZMAAlocation not on record
41
UMUlocation not on record
35
Tartu, EE
32
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
32
Zürich, CH
25
Podgorica, ME
23
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
22
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
17
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
16
University of Tokyo, Department of Zoologylocation not on record
14
John May Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
13
Philadelphia, US
12
Sion, CH
10
Paro, BT
10
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
10
Nijmegen, NL
9
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
8
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
7
CBDClocation not on record
7
Naturmuseum St. Gallenlocation not on record
6
Geneva, CH
6
Tallinn, EE
5
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
4
Winterthur, CH
4
Bern, CH
4
SFRAlocation not on record
4
NCMGlocation not on record
3
Kuopio, FI
2
DABUHlocation not on record
2
ЗМКУlocation not on record
2
MZLUlocation not on record
2
Brussels, BE
2
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
2
New Haven, US
2
Denver, US
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Stockholm, SE
1
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
1
ZSMlocation not on record
1
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
1
ЗМ СО РАНlocation not on record
1
ННПМ НАНУlocation not on record
1
45 institutions · 964 of 1 042 vouchered records shown · 78 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Acronicta tridens was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.