Achrysocharoides atys — The Life Data

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Eulophidae/Achrysocharoides

At a glance

Occurrence records580

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens3

eDNA detections2

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Achrysocharoides atys's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility580 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF580 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD3 specimens

01Narrative

Achrysocharoides atys is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie Eulophidae. De wetenschappelijke naam werd voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1839 door Francis Walker.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding3 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Achrysocharoides atys has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens3

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections2

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type580 records

Museum / vouchered580

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO104 km²

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy94% within 1 km

≤100 m 30≤1 km 516≤10 km 33

579 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence580

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions1 of 4 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
MZLUlocation not on record	493
Zürich, CH	76
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record	10
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Zoologie Forestierelocation not on record	1

4 institutions · 580 of 580 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Achrysocharoides atys was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median16.8 °C 16.8–16.8

Seasonal swing summer↔winter12.6 °C

Max temp (day)20.6 °C

Min temp (night)12.6 °C

Precipitation57.3 mm/mo

Air humidity61.4 %

Moisture balance-54.0 mm/mo

Vapour deficit739 Pa

Wind speed4.10 m/s

Cloud cover39.5 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.